Joseph Allen & Sons Bowie (NON-XLL): restoration + tang mark question

Joined
Jun 3, 2022
Messages
391
Hello everybody,

After a long time surfing these forums from the shadows, I decided to create an account and begin my active participation by sharing one of my latest acquisitions/projects.

The knife I'm referring to is a NON-XLL Joseph Allen & Sons Bowie from the late 19th century or (more likely) early 20th century, which was in pretty rough shape - quite a bit of active rust, a recurve from sharpening, several scratches and dings (seemingly from hammering), bent guard, and a broken scale. Below I'm including some pictures from the original Ebay listing:



Though I didn't get the knife super cheap, I extended an offer, to which the seller responded with a counteroffer, which I accepted. Since I've been doing some (amateur) restorations for a year or so now, my idea was to get this rather common and certainly very trashed antique and do some restoration on it. Nothing too crazy - some grinding and heavy-duty sanding only to re-establish the edge profile and the tip; general cleaning and polishing, but without removing all the character of the blade; straightening and soldering the guard; and building and attaching a new scale to replace the broken one and match to the extent possible the surviving one. (I'm definitely brushing over some things I did, but you get the idea.) Below are some picures of the process:



The result is captured by the pictures below, which also show the leather sheath I built inspired by some of the original sheaths I've seen in pictures of other similar exemplars (not being satisfied with a previous center-seam, butt-stitched sheath I had built, which in any case seems to have been rare with this type of knife as made by this company in particular):



Clearly not a professional job, but I'm mostly happy with the outcome, especially given the poor condition in which I got the knife. Of course, the blade could've looked nicer, but I really didn't want to remove too much steel, especially since part of the stamps was already rather faint. Also, I really struggled trying to match the surviving scale, both in color and in jigging pattern, so I ended up going back and forth several times between dyeing, jigging, and sanding each scale. I kinda liked the result, as well as the fact that I was able to save (for the most part) one of the scales, but at some point I might just drop on some genuine antler. Anyways, any constructive criticism will be welcome.

Moving finally to the question alluded to in the title of the thread: Does anyone know the meaning of the "T" mark on the tang of the knife (shown in the fourth restoration picture)? I've been doing some research on the subject, but I've only found information about hallmarks which seems to pertain specifically to precious metals, and which would be problematic if applied to this knife. For example, according to the website Argenti inglesi, a serifed, capital "T" was used in Sheffield items in 1816, 1861 and 1961. However, the "England" on the ricasso indicates that the knife was made after 1890, and, according to the website StRazors, Joseph Allen & Sons was liquidated in 1933, though it was listed in directories until 1959. If anybody has any information on this mark, that would be most appreciated!

Cheers,
C.

Edit: Image links fixed, yet again.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to BF
I'm no expert but I think from my own research, your age assessment is spot on
As far as the "T", since normally hidden by the scale, my GUESS is that whatever it is, only mattered to the cutler producing the knife
... not intended as a "hallmark" or advertising stamp which would have been visible ... inspection stamp, specific cutler initial(?) ...
The stamp is very interesting and hopefully someone with knowledge will happen along
You've done a fine job with the restoration, made it yours, and I'm sure it will serve you well. NICE !!! :)
 
Thanks, BrotherJim. Yeah, I figured the "T" wasn't really a hallmark in the usual sense. However, it could still stand for production year or batch or something of the sort. I don't think it refers to the cutler who made the mark, since it would make more sense to add a maker's marks, even a secondary one, somehow visibly, even if subtly (for instance, on the spine or edge of the tang, as in some French-made19th-century navajas). We can only speculate for the moment though.
 
Hallmarks are only used on silver. I think this mark is intended to identify the forger, not because he wanted to be known to knife-collectors, but to ensure his work could be identified, and that he was paid (cutlers marked their work in the same way). Stuart Truelove was a famous Sheffield forger and maker of Bowie knife blades, but the only examples I've seen of his work were marked 'Truelove'. I guess 'T' could stand for Truelove, all Sheffield manufacturers made use of outworkers and sub-contractors, but it could stand for 'Ted' or 'Tom' ;)
 
Thanks for the info, Jack Black. That makes a lot of sense, marking the blade to ensure remuneration. Was the "Truelove" mark in the knives you mention also on the tang or visibly on the ricasso? Interesting stuff!
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the info, Jack Black. That makes a lot of sense, marking the blade to ensure remuneration. Was the "Truelove" mark in the knives you mention also on the tang? Interesting stuff!
Knives often crossed the city many times before they were finished, and a firm might use multiple forgers, or handle the work of multiple forgers, so marking work made sense. In the factories, individual cutlers marked their parts to stop their workmates 'borrowing' it, which is why knife collectors now look out for the 'SS' (Stan Shaw) mark on the brass liners of old Ibberson folders. I saw a bunch of hand-forged Truelove Bowie blades in 1993, and I have to say that I can't remember if the tangs were marked or not, but a 'T' mark certainly doesn't mean that it is his work.
 
Thanks once more for the info and insights. Yeah, I would't assume the "T" stands for "Truelove" by any means; I only asked to see if maybe marking the tang with the forger's name or initial(s) was a generalized practice at the time. Cheers!
 
Thanks once more for the info and insights. Yeah, I would't assume the "T" stands for "Truelove" by any means; I only asked to see if maybe marking the tang with the forger's name or initial(s) was a generalized practice at the time. Cheers!
Marking work was certainly widespread :thumbsup:
 
Back
Top