- Joined
- Feb 5, 2010
- Messages
- 3,911
Some (not so) recent threads got me thinking about how we judge knives and knifemakers. It occurred to me that I've never heard anyone speak of a juried/judged knife making contest.
Sure, we've had people talk about their knives compared to Brand Z knives, but how exactly does one compaire tools that were built for dissimiilar purposes? It's like comparing a hunting dog to a toy poodle.
But the AKC does it every year (comparing the dogs, I mean). What keeps us from having an ultimate knife contest?
The contest could have various classes, and certain characteristics would be judged in each class. Winners at the class level advance to the "best in show" level.
Classes would probably be based on the primary use for the knife and its suitability for that purpose. Best in show would judge other aspects, such as the aesthetics and possibly some additional aspects of suitability for uses outside the class categories.
Does any such contest currently exist? Would it generate any interest among makers if it did exist?
- Greg
Sure, we've had people talk about their knives compared to Brand Z knives, but how exactly does one compaire tools that were built for dissimiilar purposes? It's like comparing a hunting dog to a toy poodle.
But the AKC does it every year (comparing the dogs, I mean). What keeps us from having an ultimate knife contest?
The contest could have various classes, and certain characteristics would be judged in each class. Winners at the class level advance to the "best in show" level.
Classes would probably be based on the primary use for the knife and its suitability for that purpose. Best in show would judge other aspects, such as the aesthetics and possibly some additional aspects of suitability for uses outside the class categories.
Does any such contest currently exist? Would it generate any interest among makers if it did exist?
- Greg