- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
- Messages
- 1,638
So the recent Phat Bob threads led me to other Phat Bob threads and let's just say my interest has been piqued. However, I can't help but wonder how much different it is than my Dozier Folding Hunter. I know what your thinking, "stop thinking and just get it, you'll love it". Which is probably true, but I'm hoping that those who have both can chime in with how the two perform.
The obvious differences I can see:
Purchased my Dozier Folding Hunter for ~$18-20 shipped, Phat Bob can be had for ~$40-50 shipped. I really like my Dozier Hunter, locks up tight, slices like a champ, and is a featherweight in the pocket. I read Moose saying that the Phat Bob feels like it's not ever there, but at 5.6 ounces I can't picture that. My Buck 112 is the same weight and while it's not obtrusive I'm not going to forget it's there either.
So is the Dozier Hunter a poor man's version of the Phat Bob or is there a big difference in performance between the two?
Liked it so much I got the Thumb Notch version too
Pic stolen from another thread
The obvious differences I can see:
- Handle: Green Micarta vs. Zytel (black in my case)
- Lock: Liner Lock vs. Lockback
- Blade: Both hollow ground AUS-8. Phat Bob looks to be a bit wider blade with a little higher grind
- Weight: 5.6 ounces vs. 1.6 ounces
Purchased my Dozier Folding Hunter for ~$18-20 shipped, Phat Bob can be had for ~$40-50 shipped. I really like my Dozier Hunter, locks up tight, slices like a champ, and is a featherweight in the pocket. I read Moose saying that the Phat Bob feels like it's not ever there, but at 5.6 ounces I can't picture that. My Buck 112 is the same weight and while it's not obtrusive I'm not going to forget it's there either.
So is the Dozier Hunter a poor man's version of the Phat Bob or is there a big difference in performance between the two?


Liked it so much I got the Thumb Notch version too

Pic stolen from another thread