Ka-Bar USMC or Camillus Marine Combat Knife

P

Pietje010

Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
420
Hey users of BladeForum.com,

Can anyone tell me what the difference are between the Ka-Bar USMC and the Camillus Marine Combat Knife (5684B). I am planning to bay the Camillus because it is a good 30 euros cheaper and they look a lot like each other. But there must be some differences. Im specially interested in the capability of using it in the woods: cutting rope and small trees down, chopping/slicing wood and hunting. Edge holding and rust prevention are also important.
 
The KaBar was used in many wars..there's a lot of History that goes with that blade.
The Camillus is a good bargain of great quality too..you pay for the one you like best.
Also look at the Ontario SP-1..it's a comfortable handle.
One more suggestion..if you have big hands the Becker BK-7 is a very good camp knife although heavier design than the KaBar.
 
In my experience the Camillus heat treat is a little better than the Ka-Bar, and both have better heat treat that Ontario YMMV
The BK-7 is a very good choice, especially for the money. Be advised that the Camillus/Ka-Bar and the BK-7, although roughly the same length, are very different so you should handle both before you decide, if possible.
 
I have both. The KABAR's fit and finish will be infinitely better than the Camillus. Both Camillus USMC's that I have came DULL. When i say dull I mean they edge still had the black phosphate coating on it. The black epoxy powder coat on a KABAR can take a beating, you can scratch the coatin off a CAMILLUS with your fingernails.

I have 9 KABARS (next gen, traditional, impact) all razor sharp and clean.

I recommend KABAR hands down.

Jansen
 
but it's a good solid knife, especially for the price. Save 30 Euros and get the Camillus. Just my two bits.

Frank

P.S. Welcome to Bladeforums.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top