- Joined
- Apr 1, 2010
- Messages
- 261
The original Vapor was my first knife other than a SAK, and I loved it, but sadly lost it. When I went looking for a replacement I learn they had been discontinued but found both a Vapor and Vapor II online. However the change to 8Cr13MoV made them feel a little different so neither got much carry time. Anyway a few weeks ago I saw the Vapor III at a local sporting goods story I picked it up to compare to the originals. After carrying it for a bit I have decided it is a decent cheap frame lock, but not nearly as good as the Ken Onion designed ones.
It is closest in size to the Vapor II so that is the one I will compare it to.

In my opinion the Pocket clip is better on the III, but the plain curve of the spin doesn't feel nearly as good in the hand as the more ergonomic II. Plus the double sided thumb stud tends to catch rather badly when being pulled from a pocket.

Lock up is about the same.

The thumb stud on the III is much smaller, it still deploys well, but not as nicely as the II.

Strangely I like the pins on the III more, though it is a strange place to put the extra bit of effort in the design.

Not mentioned above: The lack of jimping on the III gives you a much less secure grip, especially when a little sweat or water is added. Another thing the III is missing is indentation in the handle behind the thumb stud, which makes it just a tiny bit harder to open. Another difference is the III has a hollow grind as instead of the full flat on the II, my personal preference is for the flat. Still not a bad knife, but not as well designed as the older ones.
If only I could have the originals with a better blade steel. I would buy two of those, or maybe three.
This was my first review, please let me know what you think. Thank you.
It is closest in size to the Vapor II so that is the one I will compare it to.

In my opinion the Pocket clip is better on the III, but the plain curve of the spin doesn't feel nearly as good in the hand as the more ergonomic II. Plus the double sided thumb stud tends to catch rather badly when being pulled from a pocket.

Lock up is about the same.

The thumb stud on the III is much smaller, it still deploys well, but not as nicely as the II.

Strangely I like the pins on the III more, though it is a strange place to put the extra bit of effort in the design.

Not mentioned above: The lack of jimping on the III gives you a much less secure grip, especially when a little sweat or water is added. Another thing the III is missing is indentation in the handle behind the thumb stud, which makes it just a tiny bit harder to open. Another difference is the III has a hollow grind as instead of the full flat on the II, my personal preference is for the flat. Still not a bad knife, but not as well designed as the older ones.
If only I could have the originals with a better blade steel. I would buy two of those, or maybe three.
This was my first review, please let me know what you think. Thank you.