Hi guys,
A Q rose in my pondering mind:
I have folders - robust, and dainty
I have fixed blades - Choppers/ Survival, bushcrafters, and dainty
My assumptions are:
For dainty blades,
I assume they are supposed to do household/ office chores, cutting through soft/ dainty material, and intermittently though the day/ week
So, thin geometry, flat/ hollow primary grind, 15-20 deg secondary grind, stainless - sharper is better, and will probably hold an edge for a long time
For more robust folders and fixed,
I assume they are tasked with shed/ garden/ back office tasks - such as cutting through cardboard, zip ties, bush pruning, etc - a daily use and a bit more intense to the dainty ones
So, Not so thin geometry, a bit bigger in size and weight, more robust in locking mechanism (folders), Flat/ Hybrid primary grind, stainless, 17-22 deg secondary grind - here sharpness hits a peak where sharper means it will lose its edge faster, and will not bring any appreciable advantage to being not hair whittling sharp, just paper cutting sharp..-Or it will necessitate improved wear resistance - which means better metal/ heat treatment and so higher price tag.
For Outdoors/ bushcraft knives,
I assume that between making fire/ cutting small branches, feathersticking, and such tasks, the preferred primary grind is flat/ saber/scandi, and the secondary grind (when not truly scandi) is flt, with 20-25 deg, flat/convex.
Now cutting paper sharp is not the point. It rather has to be corrugated cardboard sharp, to perform all these tasks without losing performance.
For shoppers, well.. the angle of the secondary grind is even steeper 22-30 deg, and/or switching to convex profile (scandi or full), where the secondary grind/ if there is one, is trying to present as much material behind the cutting edge as fast as possible.
Here such knife should be tire rubber sharp, or very thick cardboard. Anything else is overkill, and would not introduce an appreciable advantage.
My Q is:
Is the reasoning behind what I'm suggesting sound? (right sharpness for the right task) ? -OR am I completely off? -And if so, please let me know your thoughts in detail..
Cheers
A Q rose in my pondering mind:
I have folders - robust, and dainty
I have fixed blades - Choppers/ Survival, bushcrafters, and dainty
My assumptions are:
For dainty blades,
I assume they are supposed to do household/ office chores, cutting through soft/ dainty material, and intermittently though the day/ week
So, thin geometry, flat/ hollow primary grind, 15-20 deg secondary grind, stainless - sharper is better, and will probably hold an edge for a long time
For more robust folders and fixed,
I assume they are tasked with shed/ garden/ back office tasks - such as cutting through cardboard, zip ties, bush pruning, etc - a daily use and a bit more intense to the dainty ones
So, Not so thin geometry, a bit bigger in size and weight, more robust in locking mechanism (folders), Flat/ Hybrid primary grind, stainless, 17-22 deg secondary grind - here sharpness hits a peak where sharper means it will lose its edge faster, and will not bring any appreciable advantage to being not hair whittling sharp, just paper cutting sharp..-Or it will necessitate improved wear resistance - which means better metal/ heat treatment and so higher price tag.
For Outdoors/ bushcraft knives,
I assume that between making fire/ cutting small branches, feathersticking, and such tasks, the preferred primary grind is flat/ saber/scandi, and the secondary grind (when not truly scandi) is flt, with 20-25 deg, flat/convex.
Now cutting paper sharp is not the point. It rather has to be corrugated cardboard sharp, to perform all these tasks without losing performance.
For shoppers, well.. the angle of the secondary grind is even steeper 22-30 deg, and/or switching to convex profile (scandi or full), where the secondary grind/ if there is one, is trying to present as much material behind the cutting edge as fast as possible.
Here such knife should be tire rubber sharp, or very thick cardboard. Anything else is overkill, and would not introduce an appreciable advantage.
My Q is:
Is the reasoning behind what I'm suggesting sound? (right sharpness for the right task) ? -OR am I completely off? -And if so, please let me know your thoughts in detail..
Cheers