not2sharp
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 1999
- Messages
- 20,575
The script written for most knife reviews is basically the same, we are shown the knife, the sheath and the packaging, cut a few sheets of paper, and then go on to cut, baton or chop wood. It doesn't seem to matter whether the knife is small or large, folding or fixed, heavy ot lite, we end up attacking wood; so much so that I wonder if there is a popular fear that would have us arm against a hord of maurading ents. Obviously, wood is common around most camp sites, and it can be used to build shelters, fires and numerous tools and utensils, but is there more to knives than processing wood? Given enough time and energy, I could probably bring down a California redwood with a kitchen butter knife, but does that make it a better butter knife?
Just becuase nails are plentiful doen't mean that everything should be used as a hammer. It would be great to see other creative and informative ways of testing and evaluating knives. Can balistic gelatine be used to simulate damage, or to see how useful a design might be for processing game? We may discover that some folder designs are inherently dangerous, because the locking mechanism is designed in a way that may be exposed to being released under such conditions, or that a fixed bladed knife is less than idea because the blade, guard or handle design makes it difficult to retain or manuver the knife in such a medium.
Knives are versatile tools which collectively represent a wide range of use. But, much like any other tool, their design implies some advantage for specific tasks. Just becaue I can use a flat headed screw driver to turn a phillips head screw, does not mean that I should. Knife testing would be more helpful if we stopped looking for the one knife that can be pressed into doing it all, and instead focused on where each design excells.
n2s