- Joined
- Oct 28, 2006
- Messages
- 13,363
Though this thread doesn't necessarily have anything to do with Bruce Voyles recent thread where he announced his postponing July’s "Spirit of Steel Show", it did start my thinking on the subject.
First of all, it’s yet to be determined if or how much knife shows are going to suffer from this horrid economical climate. As usual, there seems to be mixed opinions as to the degree of success enjoyed by the few recent shows.
At the risk of my starting yet another thread which asks a question, I’m wondering if there could be benefit for promoters, dealers, makers and even collectors in postponing more shows until the current economy improves. Again, I'm only wondering not saying promoters should postpone shows and referring more to the smaller to medium (regional shows) rather than those such as Blade.
I find it interesting, that as it’s worked out, we are finding an increase in knife shows rather than a decrease in number.
From a maker’s standpoint, show postponements could be looked at two ways.
As a negative, it could reduce exposure for maker’s knives at a time when they may need it most. However some maker’s might welcome a few postponements as they may not be able to afford the expense of going to shows in this economy only to loose money due to weak sales. He may rather use this time and/or money to advertise or catch up on his/her orders. I’m assuming there are usually negatives association with a maker/dealer canceling as they are pre-committed to table fees and could lost their table position or even ability to return the following year.
I imagine dealers could benefit, as fewer shows may boost their on-line sales, though I realize Les says his internet sales increase right before a show.
Perhaps a promoter could benefit from postponing a show which he feels may be unprofitable considering the economy.
I would like to hear from makers, dealers, promoters, other show vendors and collectors as to your views.
Hope this thread generates interesting, informative and productive discussion and as usual, I thank you in advance for your opinions, views and participation.
First of all, it’s yet to be determined if or how much knife shows are going to suffer from this horrid economical climate. As usual, there seems to be mixed opinions as to the degree of success enjoyed by the few recent shows.
At the risk of my starting yet another thread which asks a question, I’m wondering if there could be benefit for promoters, dealers, makers and even collectors in postponing more shows until the current economy improves. Again, I'm only wondering not saying promoters should postpone shows and referring more to the smaller to medium (regional shows) rather than those such as Blade.
I find it interesting, that as it’s worked out, we are finding an increase in knife shows rather than a decrease in number.
From a maker’s standpoint, show postponements could be looked at two ways.
As a negative, it could reduce exposure for maker’s knives at a time when they may need it most. However some maker’s might welcome a few postponements as they may not be able to afford the expense of going to shows in this economy only to loose money due to weak sales. He may rather use this time and/or money to advertise or catch up on his/her orders. I’m assuming there are usually negatives association with a maker/dealer canceling as they are pre-committed to table fees and could lost their table position or even ability to return the following year.
I imagine dealers could benefit, as fewer shows may boost their on-line sales, though I realize Les says his internet sales increase right before a show.
Perhaps a promoter could benefit from postponing a show which he feels may be unprofitable considering the economy.
I would like to hear from makers, dealers, promoters, other show vendors and collectors as to your views.
Hope this thread generates interesting, informative and productive discussion and as usual, I thank you in advance for your opinions, views and participation.
Last edited: