<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Esav Benyamin:
rdangerer, I had to laugh all the way through your post.
You didn't have the time to learn the Sharpmaker; but I was getting fine results as I played with it while watching the video, before I even learned all Sal's techniques.
Then you go on to describe all kinds of more complex systems! You obviously know your stuff. I think you just don't pay much attention to the Sharpmaker because you don't need anything that simple anymore
I like the simplicity, portability, snd speed. Of course it isn't much good for reprofiling, but it will keep working knives dangerously sharp.</font>
Esav, no need to write about laughter which implies derision. Others share my views, plenty share yours.
Recall the original question on the post ...guy wanted a jig-guided sharpener. I addressed that and more.
I'm not trying to overcomplicate things, just offering my own personal experience with three systems (Sharpmaker, jig, and bench grinder). YMMV.
Point is I have tried using the Sharpmaker and it is very time consuming (and to me, therefore, inefficient) for reprofiling. And I can very consistently exceed my own results on the Sharpmaker with the Lansky. (diamond, grabby shaving edge).
Assuming that you are willing to reprofile your knives (and I get so many different angles from the factory & custom makers, most vary angle from rear to tip of blade), then I happen to get much sharper, most consistent, and therefore quicker
resharpening results by:
1. using a jig
2. reprofiling my factory edges for constant angle
3. using diamond
4. using Lansky (Gatco is about same)
You imply the jig is slow and not portable. My Sharpmaker takes up about the same volume of space as my Lansky box. So both are equally portable.
I guess it takes me about 30 seconds to get knife in jig. Another 30 to get the rods into two stones. And maybe 3 minutes in front of TV to take a reprofiled but dull knife back to shaving with only the fine diamond stone. That might not be faster than what you can touch up on your Sharpmaker, but for me, I like the diamond-induced edge better so the speed issue is moot (unless 4 minutes in front of the TV strikes you as unreasonable). There are diamond sleeves available for the Spyderco now that I think about it.
For my soft stellite paring knives, the Sharpmaker is quicker and works fine (this is about 1/2 straightening of the edge, 1/2 removing a bit of metal). The rest of the kitchen knives get a near-to-shaving edge on a motorized diamond sharpener: Chef's Choice EdgeSelect 120. I can sharpen 12 knives in 6 minutes. Not suitable for nice folders or blades with any recurve though.
For serrations, the Sharpmaker works very well, as well or a bit better than the Lansky stone for serrations, and Sharpmaker is faster. So that's what I use on serrations.
I would also add that if you own a Sebenza or CRK fixed blade, you will find that you'll destroy that convex final edge CRK puts on his knives with a jig system...it flattens out that convexivity. The Sharpmaker will do well if you learn how to keep only that tiny bit of final edge on the stone. I get better results with a flat board with rubber pad glued on top, and use of 400 and then 600 grit sandpaper, with a pull stroke to keep true convexivity. YMMV.
One other thing... as you use knives for varying tasks (daily carry vs. heavy work outdoors), you may decide you want to use differing angles (maybe a steep, wicked sharp for daily carry, and a taller/tougher angle for heavy work). The Spyderco is limited to the angles that they supply in the base of the device. The new one has two sets of slots and so two angles for knives. I think they are 30 and 40 deg (included angle) but don't remember and it isn't marked. And another angle for scissors that holds ceramic rod nearly flat so is not useable really for knives.
Many of these other systems go from 4 settings (Lansky is 17, 20, 25, 30) to continuously variable from around 15 to 33 degrees not-included angles.
Anyway, to the extent that the poster gets an idea of what he/she wants to try first, then so be it.
[This message has been edited by rdangerer (edited 04-29-2001).]