- Joined
- Mar 1, 2010
- Messages
- 674
What group of knives do you think appear too much alike at a glance? These could be things limited to something as simple as overall shape or sets of very similar materials in a slightly different package, or smaller details depending on how sensitive your design tastes are. For me it's not a huge turn-off when one particular maker's blades all look very similar, but I personally think it doesn't say much for creativity.
The first few that spring to my mind are RJ Martin, Tops/ESEE/Becker/any other 1095 and micarta combos, and Strider (just as examples, nothing against their build quality, reputation, etc., just that there seems to be really only one or two styles of knife at a glance). I'm not saying that they don't look good (if it ain't broke, don't fix it), but I do really appreciate makers that can consistently come up with fresh designs that appeal to a wide variety of people. In contrast, there's the matter of a particular maker's "style," but shouldn't you be able to tell who made it even if it doesn't look exactly like something else made by the same company?
My point is that a variation in the line-up is always nice. What opinions do my fellow knife nuts have on this matter?
The first few that spring to my mind are RJ Martin, Tops/ESEE/Becker/any other 1095 and micarta combos, and Strider (just as examples, nothing against their build quality, reputation, etc., just that there seems to be really only one or two styles of knife at a glance). I'm not saying that they don't look good (if it ain't broke, don't fix it), but I do really appreciate makers that can consistently come up with fresh designs that appeal to a wide variety of people. In contrast, there's the matter of a particular maker's "style," but shouldn't you be able to tell who made it even if it doesn't look exactly like something else made by the same company?
My point is that a variation in the line-up is always nice. What opinions do my fellow knife nuts have on this matter?