- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
- Messages
- 8,968
Hoping you guys will tolerate this to let me gather some info on something I am working on in my collecting. I am trying to get knives that make up sort of an evolution of the modern folder, which is of course outside this sub-forum's description, and I won't be bringing up most of the knives I have sought with this theme in mind. But what I would like your help with is identifying the earlier, perhaps 'transitional', knives.
As I have read here before, you guys know what is and isn't traditional, that it isn't so simply rattled off as bullet points in a description. I have a Spyderco Worker, and that in a few ways I think obviously doesn't fit as a traditional, but then I have a couple of knives that pre-date it that I think lead to the market being as it is today. I have a '64 Buck 110, and one of the micarta lockback Al Mar SEREs. Neither of these have pocket clips, both are bolstered, and the Buck has brass and wood. I think it is more or less accepted that the Buck has a place with traditionals, and I think the SERE was a 'tactical' step beyond it just a couple years before Spyderco did their thing (79 to 81, I think). So I wonder if the Buck is appropriate to my theme, and if so was there something before it as well. Something like a Mercator, or a navaja, a single bladed locking folder like that? Or does something non-locking come into play, like the Douk-douk? Or all those basically traditionals in a full sense? I'm asking about specific knives, but also maybe if there was a trend before the 70s or 80s other than switchblades that wasn't traditional as most here define it.
I ask here because I figure you guys will best know what is most fitting for traditional vs non, rather than in general discussion where it may only be a matter of time period or materials that people think about without the nuance of the times and perceptions. Feel free to lock it if this won't work.
As I have read here before, you guys know what is and isn't traditional, that it isn't so simply rattled off as bullet points in a description. I have a Spyderco Worker, and that in a few ways I think obviously doesn't fit as a traditional, but then I have a couple of knives that pre-date it that I think lead to the market being as it is today. I have a '64 Buck 110, and one of the micarta lockback Al Mar SEREs. Neither of these have pocket clips, both are bolstered, and the Buck has brass and wood. I think it is more or less accepted that the Buck has a place with traditionals, and I think the SERE was a 'tactical' step beyond it just a couple years before Spyderco did their thing (79 to 81, I think). So I wonder if the Buck is appropriate to my theme, and if so was there something before it as well. Something like a Mercator, or a navaja, a single bladed locking folder like that? Or does something non-locking come into play, like the Douk-douk? Or all those basically traditionals in a full sense? I'm asking about specific knives, but also maybe if there was a trend before the 70s or 80s other than switchblades that wasn't traditional as most here define it.
I ask here because I figure you guys will best know what is most fitting for traditional vs non, rather than in general discussion where it may only be a matter of time period or materials that people think about without the nuance of the times and perceptions. Feel free to lock it if this won't work.