Large plain sebenza VS MT SOCOM-E Large plain. (large pics)

Joined
Nov 17, 1999
Messages
676
Hello Folks,


I recently got my Sebenza (thanks John !) and I absolutely love it. I started to carry it rightpocket and SOCOM-E leftpocket. After a few days of woodwalking I used it enough to make a statement about the knives. So here goes :

1. Handle: a) ergonomics
The SOCOM's handle takes some getting used to, as it almost forces your thumb up the ramp for cutting, in that position, it really feels at home (this is also a much used fighting grip I think). In the regular grip, like you hold a stick, it doesn't feel comfortable, it even has the tendancy to move around when using. When you put your thumb on the blade, it suddenly feels good again in your hand. The ramps all over the knife provide security, maybe even too much, as for large hands the can get abrasive and cause blisters.. lucky it fits my hand.

The sebenza : at first you're amazed at it's lightness.. and in your hand, it really feels at home. Let's just say that the few positions the SOCOM really likes, the SOCOM feels better. In any other position, the sebenza is the clear winner here. The texture of the Ti is also suprisingly soft and grippy. With the sebenza you got a feeling of power in your hand, it feels strong. It also feels much more versatile then the Socom's handle.

sebbie1.jpg


Or for people who don't see pics :

http://www.student.khleuven.be/~0101747/sebbie1.jpg

B) clip :

Sebenza clip is much better designed and stronger, feels more secure.
The extra bend in it makes sure it clips another time behind the thick seam on a jeans or behind a zipper.
The SOCOM's clip isn't so secure, but is on the better end of the blade for fast drawing. The Sebenza also feels more at home in your pocket, while the SOCOM always has a ramp coming out, which makes it much easier to loose if a running trough brush or so.
Note : most secure clip I've ever seen is on the SERE 2K.

sebbieclip.jpg

http://www.student.khleuven.be/~0101747/sebbieclip.jpg

c) opening action :

Needles to say... Sebenza is MUUUUUUUCH smoother, almost addictive to play with. Thumb stud is also very nice and feels good to the touch, but is only single sided, which may be a bad point.
SOCOM opening is also buttersmooth, but not so perfectionized as on the sebbie. Thumbstud is larger, could be more comfortable to some folks, but doesn't matter for me.

d) lock :

Framelock VS microbar lock.... hmm
When the microbar lock is open, the aluminium is down to a fairly sharp thin edge.. May be uncomforatble for some folks, again, doesn't bother me, as it isn't sharp enough to cut.
Feel.. both have that re-assuring sound when locking, I dunno why, but I just like the sound. The sebenza has a "cachong" sound while the socom has a shorter "click".
In sheer strength, I think the sebenza wins tough..
In ease of opening closing the sebenza is better too, as it feels adjustable.. if you squeeze it, it just get's tighter and tighter, making disengaging more difficult. The SOCOM is totally unaffected by any squeezing, it stays the same to disengage. I think both easily pass any spinewhacking test, I don't do the tough.
I'm a fairly stronge dude, and neither of the knives moved a muscle when I tried to force the closed. If I would have put this kind of force on a regular wrist which is holding a knife, the wrist would have snapped first.
Overall.. strength is the same for human beings, ease of disengaging is better with the SOCOM, but the sebbie is better adjustable, but takes more getting used to.

sebbielocks.jpg

http://www.student.khleuven.be/~0101747/sebbielocks.jpg

2. Blade : A) grind :

The blade's difference in thickness is very apparent. The SOCOM-E's blade is almost twice as thick as the Sebenza's blade, It's flatground with a nice false edge. It works good, especially if cutting wood or harder stuff/work. The grind's plunge cuts are excactly even, the false edge's grind lines are also excactly even.
Tip is very sharp yet increases in thickness fairly fast. Takes about 2 inches to reach the full spine thickness.

Sebenza : Much better grind for utility cutting, especially light work (and let's face it... that is what we regulary do with our knives). It's hollowground, which makes sure it's profile is thin, so it outcuts the SOCOM by a wide margin in meat, vegetablesm bread, cheese.... But.. the plunge cuts aren't excactly even. On one side it makes a wider arc the on the other side. I know, I'm a perfectionist.. It matters about half a millimeter.

UNEVEN.jpg

http://www.student.khleuven.be/~0101747/UNEVEN.jpg

B) edgeholding :

Double bonus for sebenza. I've never seen a so perfectionized working grind. It holds the excact middle between too thin and too thick for utility work. Plus it's steel is fabulous. I'd compare it to 52100, but then stainless. And a tad less tough probably, but I'm not gonna do any bend tests :D

The SOCOM cuts worse, but that has to do with the twice as thick grind. It's 154-CM cuts very well, but you notice that it deteriorates faster then the BG-42 on the Sebenza. I'd consider it's worse performance in cutting 10 % to it's lesser steel, 90 % to it's lesser grind.

But..... If you wanna stab, or heavy work like light chopping or wood cutting, the SOCOM-E might be a better idea.

3. conclusion:

The Sebenza costs 150 $ more then the SOCOM, but you do notice it. The fit 'n finish on the SOCOM is damn near perfect, but the sebenza is closer to perfection, altough it's not visible any more with the naked eye. The small flaw in the sebenza.. well, I consider it like a flaw in a Persian rug, The make one in every rug, because otherwise they would be excactly the same.
The SOCOM-E emphasises it's tactical function, and is much better in this then the sebenza. However..
In overall quality the sebenza is better, and in a regular EDC role it is better too.
This is not a sebenza-influenced speech, because overall, It's just a EDC knife for me.. in this role, it's the best I've ever seen tough.

And it has something magical, the blue spacer, the blue thumbstud, the Ti and the neat stonewash... I dunno what it is.

Let's just say that sebenza's are addictive.. I probably will never be able to carry a spyderco of Benchmade again :( :p :rolleyes: :D


Greetz and take care all, Bart.
 
Interesting review, Bart. It seems like a well-balanced commentary on the strengths and weaknesses of both knives. Thanks for the pictures as well; this is the first time I've seen the new Sebenza clip. I'm curious if you find the non-slip surfaces (the inlay and checkering) on the SOCOM to be useful in situations where your grip is compromised (like very tired, cold hands, or wet conditions), or do these surfaces just get in the way of a comfortable grip?
 
Hello,

Thanks for the kind words about the review.
I gotta work on them pics, they're too wide to make it easy reading :D

About the SOCOM, I have replaced the inlays with rayskin inlays, Thanks to Matt Geissal for making them for me.
They don't really improve grip tough.. they just look good. The original kraton inlays would probably have been better. The ramps on the other hand do improve grip when your hands are wet and cold.

Especially if cold is an issue, ít get's pretty cold & wet here in belgium in the woods, and then they do make a difference.

Another difference I forgot is the power you can put on a cut.. It seems the SOCOM is formed so you can put more power on a cut, but the sebenza on the other hand doesn't need more power to make the same cut.

Greetz and take care.

Bart.
 
Bart, I seem to recall you saying a few months ago that Sebenzas were overpriced and overrated :D ! Changed your mind?
 
I could have said that. And I bet everyone can understand that.. let's face it... Sebenza's are rather high priced.

But... they are worth it, and that is difficult to find believe unless you find out for yoruself.

And you must admit... at times some people think sebenza's are divine objects... which they are not... maybe I was just overreacting on that.

In any case.. the review is a good enough appology to all you sebbie-freaks out there? :D :D :D

greetz and take care, Bart.
 
Bart, check back on our e-mail exhange in August. I quote: "[Sebenzas] are *W*A*Y* overpriced... if you modify a BM pinnacle a bit, you got a 97 % Sebenza which actually is better ergonomically speaking. At 1/3 the price!"

But, yeah, I know what you mean, I'm not putting you down at all. I respect your opinion and so I take your positive review of the Sebenza seriously. I want one, but am having a hard time making the financial commitment.
 
I get 20 mails a day, and my life has become twice as busy since half a year ago... I only keep E-mails which are important or just a week old.

But I do remember our conversation, and I did say that.. I still believe it. Question on which my answer did change by the sebenza is whether it's worth to have a knife 3 % better? I would have said no, now I say yes.

My friend Achim once said his sebenza is the cheapest knife he ever bought... I think I will never be able to walk around with a spyderco anymore, simply because it feels cheap. In reality it isn't cheap, but the sebenza makes me feel good when I'm carrying it. The SOCOM is close, but it's very pricy as well.

Greetz and take care.
 
Nice review, Bart. You have 2 really top-rate knives there. IMHO, they are very different. The Socom E is a very tactical oriented knife, while the Sebenza is ,IMO, a more utility blade, with "back-up" tactical abilities. Enjoy.:)
 
I have a couple of Sebenzas and a few Microtechs (including SOCOMs), and I think that for the most part Bart presented an accurate view, but it may be colored a little by the newness of his Sebbie. :) I do have some comments I would like to add:
I think that the LCC would have been a more comparable MT product to compare the Sebenza to, better materials and the fit and finish is even better than the SOCOM and the design is great.
The handle on the SOCOM is more secure under heavy pressure (for a folder) than the Sebenza in my hand (ie wood carving, cutting though a large block of cheese (laugh if you want but this is a fairly heavy task) etc.
The Sebenza carries nicer in the pocket than the SOCOM, but the LCC is equal in pocket comfort even though it is thicker.
Factory edge and grinds: I have never seen a CRK or MT product that was not perfectly symeterical. MT's are as sharp, if not sharper than CRK out of the box, are easier to sharpen and hold an edge just as well in my experience (but then again I always sharpen my knives way before they are "dull", like as soon as the edge loses a little bit of crispness)
As Bart points out the Sebbie is a better utility blade shape and the SOCOM more of a "tactical".
CRK fit and finish is great, but so is MT, I don't see that one is better than the other (and I have examined and own many of each's product).
Be careful saying that you'll never buy another BM or Spydie again because you will, you have a sickness, a disease, it is an addiction to shiny sharp objects and I feel your pain brother:)
All that being said:
The Sebenza is my EDC, it is the first thing I put in my pocket in the morning and the last thiung I take out at night. If I could only have one folder, Sebenza would be its name.
Stay sharp,
Chad
 
Chad-It's good to know that I won't be getting your only Sebenza! ;) Which model is your EDC? (small, large, or?)
 
My EDC Sebbie is a large, plain with polished blade. The Ti slabs are heavily marked from keys, pens, rings, etc. I prefer a polished blade over the stonewashed and it doesn't show any scratches (which was a slight concern between the blade finishes)
I've been carrying this one for quite a few months now, opened it about a billion times and it really locks up tight.
I actually like the Classic style sebbie handle but prefer the new style blade shape.....
BTW thanks for the trade, it was a real pleasure dealing with you.
Chad
 
Back
Top