I live in the Los Angeles County area and I've been EDCing a RAT 1. Now recently I've been looking into getting my first high end folder, and I've decided on an HK Axis, but I'm not sure if I should get the mini or the full sized. I decided to look into the knife laws around here and found out that my RAT 1 was actually illegal all along, as I've been carrying it unconcealed (pocket clip) and its blade is well over 3 inches. The full sized HK would also be illegal, as it's around the same size as the RAT 1. However, I've never been stopped or anything for it, even though I'm also obviously a minor. Has anyone here actually gotten in trouble for having too large a folder in a 3 inch or less area? It seems almost unheard of, but I don't want to risk losing an expensive blade. Also, this part might be in the wrong thread, but how much of the ergonomics am I sacrificing if I decide to go with the mini? I'm so used to carrying and using larger knives that I can't imagine using one with a handle 1.5 inches shorter and a blade 0.5 inches shorter. So many people seem to prefer carrying a smaller knife, but I've never actually done so before. I have been in situations where I wish I had a smaller knife (such as when I want to cut food to share inside a restaurant), but I can really only afford one high end folder (I would get both if I could) and I use my knives in both outdoor areas and urban areas, so I'm kind of torn between being outdoor-friendly or sheeple-friendly. I also want a knife large enough to use as a last ditch self defense tool. Do people really feel the weight of a larger knife compared to a smaller one? Any advice on whether I should go with the mini or full sized would be appreciated. Sorry if this post got way off topic in the "laws" section, but my questions don't really fit in either here or somewhere else. Feel free to move this around to another section. I do have quite some time to make a decision, as I'm a minor without the funds to buy something so expensive right away.
Last edited: