- Joined
- Apr 6, 2002
- Messages
- 1,356
Occasionally, there are times when I don't carry a second knife and just rely on one SAK or multitool. I only own two tools that I carry in this situation - my Victorinox FieldMaster or Leatherman Wave. And when I feel that pliers or dedicated screwdrivers are necessary, that leaves only the Wave.
I have had my Wave since they were first released, and I like it. However, when I use it, I sometimes find myself getting frustrated. It just seems like a very nice concept that falls a little short on the implementation. It is close to ideal for a "do it all" tool, but not quite there yet. Here are a few examples:
1. It has two of my favorite blade shapes. The serrated sheepsfoot for sawing through hard plastic materials and a clip point for everything else. Unlike other people, I don't even have complaints about the steel. However, the thumb slot is too small and has sharp edges on it. I have not found anything small enough to smooth the edge with. The blades are also a little stiff to open one-handed. None of the lubricants that I have tried have helped much. I'm definitely spoiled by my Spydies and Benchmades.
2. The handles are smooth when opened to use the pliers, but still have sharp edges when closed. This makes it less comfortable than it should be when using all other tools, either the inner or outer ones. I would prefer a shape like the Leatherman Juice.
3. IMO, the saw is inferior to the FieldMaster's saw. I have looked at the teeth on both. The only difference that I can see is that the Wave has teeth with a longer slope on the front and shorter slope on the back. The overall effect is that the teeth are more slanted. The Fieldmaster's teeth are symmetrical and vertical. With the Wave, I have tried cutting with the pull stroke, like some folding saws require, and on the push stroke, like traditional hand saws. The Fieldmaster just seems to cut better.
4. The three large tools - Phillips head screwdriver, large straight screwdriver, and can opener - are a pain to dig out. I have very short fingernails and find these three tools inconvenient to open. I prefer the little extension on top of the tool, like the Juice has, for opening. By the way, the infamous "tool clumping" of the four smaller tools in the other handle doesn't bother me at all.
None of these things is a major problem. I still appreciate the design of the Wave and find it useful. And, I understand that one tool that tries to do everything will always be a compromise compared to the best-of-breed for each function. But the impression that it leaves in my mind is of an unfinished work. As I say, frustrating! I think I'll look for a feedback email address on the Leatherman web site. Maybe there will be a Wave II someday.
I have had my Wave since they were first released, and I like it. However, when I use it, I sometimes find myself getting frustrated. It just seems like a very nice concept that falls a little short on the implementation. It is close to ideal for a "do it all" tool, but not quite there yet. Here are a few examples:
1. It has two of my favorite blade shapes. The serrated sheepsfoot for sawing through hard plastic materials and a clip point for everything else. Unlike other people, I don't even have complaints about the steel. However, the thumb slot is too small and has sharp edges on it. I have not found anything small enough to smooth the edge with. The blades are also a little stiff to open one-handed. None of the lubricants that I have tried have helped much. I'm definitely spoiled by my Spydies and Benchmades.
2. The handles are smooth when opened to use the pliers, but still have sharp edges when closed. This makes it less comfortable than it should be when using all other tools, either the inner or outer ones. I would prefer a shape like the Leatherman Juice.
3. IMO, the saw is inferior to the FieldMaster's saw. I have looked at the teeth on both. The only difference that I can see is that the Wave has teeth with a longer slope on the front and shorter slope on the back. The overall effect is that the teeth are more slanted. The Fieldmaster's teeth are symmetrical and vertical. With the Wave, I have tried cutting with the pull stroke, like some folding saws require, and on the push stroke, like traditional hand saws. The Fieldmaster just seems to cut better.
4. The three large tools - Phillips head screwdriver, large straight screwdriver, and can opener - are a pain to dig out. I have very short fingernails and find these three tools inconvenient to open. I prefer the little extension on top of the tool, like the Juice has, for opening. By the way, the infamous "tool clumping" of the four smaller tools in the other handle doesn't bother me at all.
None of these things is a major problem. I still appreciate the design of the Wave and find it useful. And, I understand that one tool that tries to do everything will always be a compromise compared to the best-of-breed for each function. But the impression that it leaves in my mind is of an unfinished work. As I say, frustrating! I think I'll look for a feedback email address on the Leatherman web site. Maybe there will be a Wave II someday.