- Joined
- Jun 5, 2002
- Messages
- 2,761
I have been into high-end customs for a few months now, i think i learn pretty quickly, and i think i have a pretty good sense of who the true masters are, who the up and comers are, and who is in neither class. Something i am learning is that when it comes to the best of the best, knives by the true masters, the old adage rings true, less IS more.
I see so many knives where the use of damascus patterns is simply overdone, the pattern is either too complex, or it's used on the blade AND bolster, often in different patterns for each, where a damascus blade OR bolster would have sufficed quite nicely and looked cleaner and more elegant. The overuse of damascus, in my opinion, can give the knife a cluttered, busy look. Compare to the masters who seem to use less damascus, often the blade is clean and not damascus, if damascus is used, generally its limited to either the blade OR the bolster, but not both, and rarely, if ever, would 2 different patterns be used on the blade and bolster. The same goes for filework. It seems the masters don't go for the ultra-fancy, over intricate work, and use instead very tasteful, elegant, SIMPLE designs, simple, BUT flawlessly executed. All of these tendencies, the sparing use of damascus and filework, focusing instead on skillful execution, gives their knives a very clean, very elegant look, much different from the assault of lines, shapes, colors, clashing patterns etc. of lesser makers who seem to feel that they need to dazzle us with a knife full of details and features, when less would have sufficed, indeed looked nicer, cleaner.
Anyone else feel this way? Am i overlooking something? Id like to hear your thoughts.
I see so many knives where the use of damascus patterns is simply overdone, the pattern is either too complex, or it's used on the blade AND bolster, often in different patterns for each, where a damascus blade OR bolster would have sufficed quite nicely and looked cleaner and more elegant. The overuse of damascus, in my opinion, can give the knife a cluttered, busy look. Compare to the masters who seem to use less damascus, often the blade is clean and not damascus, if damascus is used, generally its limited to either the blade OR the bolster, but not both, and rarely, if ever, would 2 different patterns be used on the blade and bolster. The same goes for filework. It seems the masters don't go for the ultra-fancy, over intricate work, and use instead very tasteful, elegant, SIMPLE designs, simple, BUT flawlessly executed. All of these tendencies, the sparing use of damascus and filework, focusing instead on skillful execution, gives their knives a very clean, very elegant look, much different from the assault of lines, shapes, colors, clashing patterns etc. of lesser makers who seem to feel that they need to dazzle us with a knife full of details and features, when less would have sufficed, indeed looked nicer, cleaner.
Anyone else feel this way? Am i overlooking something? Id like to hear your thoughts.