Let's hear your opinions on A2 and 3V

Joined
Jul 4, 2002
Messages
571
So, I called CRK to order a Nkonka, but they don't have any in Camo Kalguard. (I'll see if I can wait long enough for the next batch . . .I doubt it, but I'm gonna try.)

But, They do have them in both steels. I know that The A2 was chosen for the edge retention and shock absorption. 3V is supposed to be tough.

Edge retention is probably the quality that I would hold highest for this knife, with rust resistance next. So, with those qualities in mind, which steel should I get?

Opinions? Especially you guys that already have Nkonkas!

Lunumbra
 
I have carried a small Warlock that Bailey Bradshaw made for me in 3V.
The blade is .090 thick and about 3" long, in a Wharncliffe format. This is some real chain saw steel. It is exceptionally tough and wear resistance is even better then some of the CPM steels with high S/S content. I have carried it for over a year every day, it is amazing. Have not seen any rust ,and it only has 7 + % of chromium . Carbon is high ,and Vanidium is a bit less then 30V. I am back to a small Sebenza in BG-42 I am doing a different project and like the blade shape a bit better. A-2 will still do a fine job in the black knives, but if you have that Xtra c - note, I would buy 3V. I also have a 3.5" locker that also acts like a much larger blade in 3V.

Floyd
 
I'd go with the 3V if you have the extra $$$. I believe that it has better edge holding than A2 and I actually think it's even tougher. The stain resistance of 3V is also better than that of A2.
 
3V's toughness stats are friggin amazing. it's not as rust resistant as some other stainless steels like S30V (3V has a "pitting" corrosion pattern), but who cares, there's tuff cloth & marine tuff cloth if you're really concerned with rust. 3V's edge-holding? ask jerry hossom.. he'll tell you it's more than you'd ever need for most tasks.
 
Back
Top