I was given a small lightning as a gift. Several questions: Why is the spacer that separates the two scales made up of two pieces of metal, rather than one, and why is there a liner on only one side?
My only conjecture as to why Buck uses a two piece spacer is that the sheet metal is less expensive in the smaller gauge. On my knife, the two pieces do not follow the contour of the scales on the end (and so stick out just a bit), and for that matter are not ground together, which makes the knife seem to be in a much less expensive class than it is. Workmanship is expected in a $40+ knife!
The "missing" liner causes the blade to rub on that side, particularly for left-handed opening, which pushes the blade against the inside of the handle scale. In right-handed opening, the blade is pushed away from the linerless side, and opens smoothly without scraping.
One last comment; the blade was not very sharp out of the box, and dulled very quickly from there.
Ergonomically, a good knife, but the details and workmanship issues are important to us knife enthusiasts.
My only conjecture as to why Buck uses a two piece spacer is that the sheet metal is less expensive in the smaller gauge. On my knife, the two pieces do not follow the contour of the scales on the end (and so stick out just a bit), and for that matter are not ground together, which makes the knife seem to be in a much less expensive class than it is. Workmanship is expected in a $40+ knife!
The "missing" liner causes the blade to rub on that side, particularly for left-handed opening, which pushes the blade against the inside of the handle scale. In right-handed opening, the blade is pushed away from the linerless side, and opens smoothly without scraping.
One last comment; the blade was not very sharp out of the box, and dulled very quickly from there.
Ergonomically, a good knife, but the details and workmanship issues are important to us knife enthusiasts.