i want a pair of small/compact inexpensive binorulars id like to keep it under 50. their for when i go hiking or for when im target shooting with my gf and want to keep track or to help sight in.
any suggestions would be great. or what should i look for. dont know anything about them.
thank you
dylan
Umm... what distance, what caliber are we talking? Unless we're talking energetic rifle calibers, a very affected target (holes show easily) and within 50 feet, you're out of luck. Spotting downrange will take MUCH more magnification than any simple binocular is capable of providing. You will need to spend at least 10x what you're talking about here, for a single lens- a spotting scope.
Now that I've brought you down to reality: the travelites probably are the best I suppose. Really, at that price range... not much to be said. You spend your money on a Bimmer because you couldn't stand to drive a 1980s taurus; that's about the comparison equivalent of what you're talking about- maybe even a moped to your bimmer. Good glass is expensive. Especially for the ranges you are talking about.
There's really not much at the price range to recommend, except buy from a name brand. As a matter of fact, generally, there's no guarantee at that price that the binoculars are even set up right (called colliminated- meaning that the glass in the eyepiece matches up to the objective lens). If there's something on sale that normally goes for $100, it might be tested for collimination, but that's the best you can ask.
Basically, if you're not willing to spend at least $300 on binoculars/spotting scope, (yes, there are choice exceptions below that, but in general, and as a sense of dedication, especially if we're talking sighting on a range) binoculars are more a toy than a tool.
Oh yeah, and if you actually want the power to see far ranges, forget your compact specification. The further away, the higher quality/more light you need to see details, and so you need a bigger light gathering lens. Ocular tools are all about tradeoffs, and there's no way around it.
Zero