I'm posting this in Shop Talk rather than Tinkering because this subforum gets a different set of eyes.
I've posted a few questions about sharpening. It's something that interests me.
I saw this comment, and rather than muddying the thread with a reply I decided to start a separate thread. I hope that's OK.
I'm wondering if anyone here has tested this? I'm very curious about how different sharpening methods affect the life of the edge.
As best I can tell, there are a few different schools of thought.
One is blade doesn't get hot enough to matter as long as you are careful. After all, you do the final grinding post-heat treat, so sharpening with a powered belt or powered strop doesn't necessarily mean the blade gets too hot.
The second theory is that while that, yes, you grind post heat treat without affecting the performance of the blade as long as you are careful to dip blade in water, etc, but if you sharpen with a powered belt, the thin portion of metal at the very edge will get too hot and lose temper no matter what precautions you take.
(Bladsmth may be somewhere in between - powered belt is OK but not a powered strop isn't.)
The second theory seems almost probable and intuitive, yet, outside of maybe Cliff Stamp, I don't know that I've seen anyone test this. There are an awful lot of big production knife companies that sharpen with belts. As best I can tell, a lot of ABS mastersmiths and journeymen sharpen their test knives on powered belts. Probably bladesport competitors, too.
I just have to think that if there was a performance disadvantage to sharpening with a belt or power strop, the guys above would have discovered it and found a work around.
Has anyone taken two identical knives and sharpening then in different manners to see which one held an edge the longest? I know so many people experiment with and test the edge holding properties of the various steels, and that gets debated ad nauseam. I don't see people testing the edge holding properties of the different sharpening methods. Or have I just missed it?
Thanks.
I've posted a few questions about sharpening. It's something that interests me.
I saw this comment, and rather than muddying the thread with a reply I decided to start a separate thread. I hope that's OK.
DO NOT POWER STROP a blade if you want your sharp edge to last. The heat build up can severely lower the hardness of the actual edge. It won't feel hot, and will look OK, but the edge life may be greatly reduced. Just a few strops on a charged leather strip mounted on a board is all you need.
I'm wondering if anyone here has tested this? I'm very curious about how different sharpening methods affect the life of the edge.
As best I can tell, there are a few different schools of thought.
One is blade doesn't get hot enough to matter as long as you are careful. After all, you do the final grinding post-heat treat, so sharpening with a powered belt or powered strop doesn't necessarily mean the blade gets too hot.
The second theory is that while that, yes, you grind post heat treat without affecting the performance of the blade as long as you are careful to dip blade in water, etc, but if you sharpen with a powered belt, the thin portion of metal at the very edge will get too hot and lose temper no matter what precautions you take.
(Bladsmth may be somewhere in between - powered belt is OK but not a powered strop isn't.)
The second theory seems almost probable and intuitive, yet, outside of maybe Cliff Stamp, I don't know that I've seen anyone test this. There are an awful lot of big production knife companies that sharpen with belts. As best I can tell, a lot of ABS mastersmiths and journeymen sharpen their test knives on powered belts. Probably bladesport competitors, too.
I just have to think that if there was a performance disadvantage to sharpening with a belt or power strop, the guys above would have discovered it and found a work around.
Has anyone taken two identical knives and sharpening then in different manners to see which one held an edge the longest? I know so many people experiment with and test the edge holding properties of the various steels, and that gets debated ad nauseam. I don't see people testing the edge holding properties of the different sharpening methods. Or have I just missed it?
Thanks.