- Joined
- Mar 18, 2006
- Messages
- 520
Some time ago my view of the ideal hunting knife was an old but well- preserved Puma fixed blade. I eventually got a 1973( I think) Hunter's Companion in new condition. Believing I had finally reached the summit, my quest was over. Then, at a gun show, I inspected what I thoroughly believed to be a Puma White Hunter that had barely survived a serious fire of some kind. The handle, probably stag, had been completely burned away.
The remaining burnt blade had no markings left. The blade, guard, and tang looked authentic Puma as far as I could tell.
The blade tang passed through the thick guard and ended in a small threaded tang only about an inch long. It was attached to the handle with a threaded nut nestled in the recess of a skeletonized handle!!!
At home, I studied my Hunter's Companion closely. The blade spine was rounded and a different color of stainless than the exposed "tang". There was enough space above the handle rivet to allow for a nut the size and location of the one I had seen. It really appeared to me that the blade and exposed tang were two different pieces of steel.
I know old Pumas have a good reputation for strength, but it bothered me so much I trade it away and still have that belief every time I see one.
Did I deceive myself and all was well, or have we all been mistaken believing the blade and "full tang" are one piece, or is it common knowledge how they are built? It still BUGS me because I really liked that knife.
The remaining burnt blade had no markings left. The blade, guard, and tang looked authentic Puma as far as I could tell.
The blade tang passed through the thick guard and ended in a small threaded tang only about an inch long. It was attached to the handle with a threaded nut nestled in the recess of a skeletonized handle!!!
At home, I studied my Hunter's Companion closely. The blade spine was rounded and a different color of stainless than the exposed "tang". There was enough space above the handle rivet to allow for a nut the size and location of the one I had seen. It really appeared to me that the blade and exposed tang were two different pieces of steel.
I know old Pumas have a good reputation for strength, but it bothered me so much I trade it away and still have that belief every time I see one.
Did I deceive myself and all was well, or have we all been mistaken believing the blade and "full tang" are one piece, or is it common knowledge how they are built? It still BUGS me because I really liked that knife.