I get more out of some parts of tactical knives than I do out of some parts of Blade. Some of the technical stuff in Blade is good, but the overall atmosphere isn't where my knifemaking has been aimed at.
Tactical knives does, sometimes, get a bit too "tactikool" in spots- for me. But with Steve's ongoing inclusion of wilderness and field tactical, it's got a LOT of very good information and very good articles.
I'm not averse to fighting and combat knives, and do make some, so I may have more appreciation for that side than a purely utilitarian W&SSer. But both sides are well covered, and I think that (among others, but of special note I've been keyed on all of these)- Steve, John, and Joe have done a very good job of bringing the practical side of outdoors tactical to light. In fact, when I was just starting to look at the magazines, It was one of Steve's editorials on Nessmuk and the overdone emphasis on the "nessmuk knife" (often to the exclusion of the folder and hatchet!) that got me into really reading cover to cover. That editorial, in a roundabout way, also helped me have the confidence to call the full tang leukus "leuku bushcrafters."
I've made a couple knives influenced by looking through TK and saying "well, that'd be a cool knife if you took all the sharp angled point bits on the handle away". And it's yet to be seen is Gunny's column will win me over or if I'll read it every quarter so I can argue with it in my head.
I'd love to see a modification of the Seneca Run sponsored by TK- that would be pretty bitchin. Chopping, batoning (maybe, it's got issues in drama circles these days), lean-to framing, food prep, rope cutting- just a small course for time, using different people and different knives. Sort of a bushcraft decathlon.