Maharajah WW I Khukuri?

Joined
Jun 16, 2003
Messages
20,207
The Mahajarah of Jodphur supposedly had khukuris made for the regiment of Gurkhas he sponsored for the Western Front in WW I.

I think I got one! It sure looks like the khukuri illustrated in the HI FAQ article "Modern Military Khukuri Styles" AND the one illustrated at www.jnanam.net/shastra/kukri.html -- side and top views EXCEPT the bump or knob on the butt shown in both illustrations is missing. Seems to have been ground off.

A (Drop) = 3 1/16"
B (blade length) = 13"
C (blade width) = 2 3/8"
D (handle length) = 4 13/16"
Wt. = 670 grams

>Shallow chow starts 7/8" up blade and is more like illustration in HI FAQ than Ben's illustration
>Sharp demark between sharpened portion of blade (3/16" wide final convex bevel) and blade base (sharpening starts 1 1/2" from start of blade)
>Blade slotted into white metal grip
>Three-part central ring on handle
>Flat, non-fullered blade (nearly 1/4" max thickness with pronounced distal taper).
>The blade appears to be blued. One patch of rust that I don't know what to do about due to bluing. (Won't rust-remover remove blue?)
>Two small circular punch marks at top of blade near handle. No other markings.

Any input by collectors would be appreciated.
 
Not Found
The requested URL /shastra/mahraj-wwi-khuk.html was not found on this server.
 
Photos Tal? Especialy of details?

Its impossible to even make a guess without photos. Never mind give make a serious study of it.

My old one has 13.5 inch blade & a 5inch handle & weights 725gr.

& a drop of 3 & 5/16s.

I know the tolerances varied but dont know by how much.

JP might have the answear to that, I expect he has got a few tucked away!

cheers,
Spiral
 
spiraltwista said:
Photos Tal? Especialy of details?

Its impossible to even make a guess without photos. Never mind give make a serious study of it.
My old one has 13.5 inch blade & a 5inch handle & weights 725gr.
& a drop of 3 & 5/16s.
I know the tolerances varied but dont know by how much.
JP might have the answear to that, I expect he has got a few tucked away!

cheers, Spiral

Spiral, I am but a Basic Member with low technical skills.

This khuk looks much like the illustrations referenced above. One would want to have it in hand to give an opinion. I know the one in the FAQ is said to be 19" OA.

One detail: note that in the HI FAQ illustration, www.himalayan-imports.com/faq/ , the line of the ridged "bolster" portion of the handle is not at 90 degrees to the line of the blade or the handle rings -- it leans forward slightly when viewed from the side, edge down. This one has that feature. In contrast, Ben's illustration (link above) has a "bolster" that lacks the ridge and is more (gasp!) hibaki-like. It could have been smoothed out to make a better scabbard fit.
 
Heres some pix of a couple Artzi sold years ago.

With the following info.

In 1914 the Maharaja of Jodhpur (Rajasthan, India) sponsored the supply of a special Khukuri knife to the Jodphur Imperial Service Lancers of the Fourth Cavalry Division of the British army fighting in the French / German border and later on under the command of General Kenig In Palestine against the Turkish army.

ph-0.jpg

ph-5.jpg

ph-3.jpg


& another one.

ph-0.jpg

ph-2.jpg

ph-1.jpg


Can do pix of mine tommorow if that helps.

Cheers,
Spiral
 
Are crossed posted I see!

I am a basic member of low tecnical skills as well, ;) but if you cant put a photo up on any user friendly site you can just link to them.

If you want to email them to me ill post them for you.

cheers,
Spiral
 
Spiral,

Thanks for the pictures of what I will call the "Artzi" khuk.

Mine has the ridged "bolster" like the Artzi and the HI FAQ illustration -- and unlike Ben's "hibaki" style.

Mine has the three ridges on the central portion of the cho like the Artzi khuk. I can't tell about Ben's or the HI FAQ pieces due to picture quality.

Unlike mine and the HI FAQ piece, the "bolster" on the Artzi is pretty much at 90 degrees to the line of the handle -- not canted forward at top.

The Artzi looks like it could be blued. Yes?

The Artzi has an extra little notch in front of the cho on the left side before the sharpening begins. Mine dioes not have that feature and I can't tell about the HI FAQ piece or Ben's.

How about the two punch marks on the top of my blade - does your have those? And how thick is yours, is it distally tapered, and is it blued?
 
Hi Tal,
Thats 2 different kuks of Artzis, The top3 & bottom 3 are from separate kuks. I think both are blued, mine has the added cho groove but behind the cho not in front.

Mine is distaly tapered, without punch marks, 6.3mm thick.

My bolster shape area is most like the one in FAQ halfway between Bens & Artzis!

Cheers,
Spiral
 
Woops. I saw three of one side and three of the other and thought it was one khuk. Now that you explain, one blade looks distinctly darker.

Yours - and mine - are thicker than the 3/16 in the HI FAQ - IF that is what is meant by "a touch over 3/16th wide at the ricasso and the belly." I could not read 3/16 as being "width" as we usually use that term.

The text of the FAQ says "very slight or no 'ring'." Yet all four I have seen ID's as the true item -- and mine - have distinct handle rings, if not sharply-edged ones.

Sounds like lots of minor variations, as one would expect if they were jobbed out to a number of smiths/shops or made with speed > QC.
 
I guess I have seen at least 6 different aluminum handled grip Kukris, All of which the owners profess to be our famous Marajahs model, as with all things with these old Kukris, seems to be a lot of confusion. interesting to read JPs comments.
 
Hi Guys,
My kuk is 3/16 at spine over belly, same as FAQ but obviously not at riccaso. I am intrested that it is described as a flat blade with presumably no distal taper?

One of Artzis is 13in. blade one 14in.

I have noticed The kukri FAQ do contain some definate errors & generalisations in other areas that I am sure JP / Ben / Howard , would say need updating.

We might have to wait for the book or exerts of the "Military chapter" though.

At the momment its the best online information sauce, {actualy its the only one!}

Rod, Have you ant pix of these other handle styles?

Cheers,
Spiral
 
The Maharaja of Jodphur did supply a style of kukri for a Gurkha Battalion attached to the Indian Army in WW I. Not supposedly, it happened. Most of these stayed in India for his own Gurkha guards and are are numbered along with the letters FG for "fort gurad".

"I have noticed The kukri FAQ do contain some definate errors & generalisations in other areas that I am sure JP / Ben / Howard , would say need updating." quote Spiral. Much was written years ago and I know there are descriptions that definitely need revising and while I have changed things for my book changes in the FAQ can't be done since Beo is in India. Neither Ben or Howard was responsible for any errors made. The content and information is mine. Please point these errors out and quote your sources. The military chapter is completed (for now) and is the most extensive of the book.

If I said "little or no ring" that is wrong. Perhaps in my confused youth I was comparing these to the distinct rings of Nepali kukris. The "maharaja" models are all very similar, always have blued blades, shallow chos and look like the pictures showed here. Once in a while numbers will appear on the aluminum grips or blades and I have seen the maharaja's crest on one. As important as the kukri itself is the scabbard. The retaining strap and stud are usually in poor repair or gone. The chape is very well made and detailed and are critical for a complete example. The belt loop is very flimsy and how these held up at all is a mystery. In the 1950s reproductions of this knife were made as commemorative pieces with a raised crest applied to the grip. I have seen a few, but never with a scabbard.
jodphur.jpg
 
Mr. Powell,

About the matter of blade thickness. It would seem that my "possible" and Sprial's khuk are 1/4" or so at the ricasso with a distal taper that results in 3/16" at the belly area - even less pointward. How does this information match your understanding of the "standard" "maharajah"?

Alas, no sheath for mine. Some do not appreciate the value of even tatters when is comes to antigues. Amongst other things, couple of old wrecks showed me that the blade can be inleted into the wood, surrounding the blade with wood. Not for the maharajah of course, with its "quick-draw" feature (a concept borrowed by Blackjack for Reinhardt model).

I must say, but for the evident grinding off of the button on the butt, mine does look like the illustrations I have seen thus far. :)

Any suggestion as to what to do with the rusted patch? I have presumed rust remover would take off the bluing. Soak it in oil?
 
The blade widths vary but what you describe fits into the specs.

I would remove the rust and neutralize the spot. Depending on the condition you could also cold-blue the whole blade again since it sounds like this kukri has already been modified by removal of the "button" on the grip. This seriously degrades its value as an antique and rebluing won't make any difference.

I always ask for any bits and pieces connected to kukris I buy. The scabbard for the "maharaja" has a wood frame covered by formed leather with an internal/external strap for the keeper and that massive chape I mentioned. For something so well made I never understoof why there is such a wimpy belt loop.
 
Hi Tal, JP,
In my my thread "laminated sirupate" ddean came up with an interesting chemical for hardening rust{taking it to stage 2}I havent tried it yet but will experiment on a junker soon.

I have found, slinters or chisels of ivory or antler are good for picking out the rust in pits.{they are harder than rust but softer than steel.

My example of the maharajah is a "poor boy" example thats without scabbard & has some pitting.

Still an interesting & real piece of history though. I wonder who carried it & wear, & how did it lose its scabbard? Was it a souveneer battlefield pickup, found in the mud without its scabbard or not etc.etc.

But of course from a purly financial veiwpoint ,it would not fetch as much at Sothebys or some such.But thats not solley what collecting historical items is all about for me. {I do like valuble ones as well though!}

JP I am sure I have informed you of most of the errors I spotted in FAQs last year, But heres a list, hope it helps, & of course apologies to Ben & Howard ,I didnt realise all the information was from you.

Please excuse my spelling, puntuation & grammer! ;)
This will take me some time but here goes.

Kukri FAQ military.

http://www.himalayan-imports.com/faq/MilitaryStyles.htm
1,

faq.QUOTE.
"This is the style currently used by Gorkha forces. The standard specifications are 15" long with a mass of about 600 g. A similar knife is issued in the Nepalese Army. The Nepalese Army knife is somewhat smaller, at about 13" and 500 g. HW
"There is a standard issue knife for both the Gurkha (sic) Regiments in both the British and Indian Armies." (This is like HIs BAS without the scroll work on the buttcap.)


ME.
I think you already know that the Indian army currently carry the M3 evolution of the K45 , not the BAS.
Funnily enough I think you mentioned it the other day as comming from Atlanta cutlery... ...
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=296362
7th post down.

JP QUOTE."Windlass Steel was started in India during WW II to supply K45 kukris and the model they offer today is the same one issued for field use to the Indian Army. I have no idea what the other models are supposed to be for or can find any historical design they are based on."
.....................................................................................................
2,FAQ quote"The K45 was designed and made in Rawalpindi in the later part of 1945 by some of the "boys" from the Ordnance
Bureau and was so cost/time effective that all involved got the civilain award
correspondent. Quite a big deal apparently. This kukri was so good it's the one that
everyone copied and is still being made by kamis, blacksmiths, matalsmith, etc.
everywhere and more annoyingly, by Atlanta Cutlery."

Me.
I remember when I got one of the first batches of Atlanta oldies, I sent you pictures of an identical K44 sa & broad arrow marked kukri. & have since aquired an identicle K44 kukri of cmw production that is identicle to my cmw K45. Which some what prooves IMHO that the K45 was not designed in late 1945, as the identical spec. kuk was already bieng made in Calcutta in 1944.

Strange comment of yours about the Atlanta copy as well. Is it a copy or the real deal?
........................................................................................

3.FAQ quote. The workhorse of the Gurkas during WWII, this model saw service in both Europe and Pacific theaters. This is probably the best combination of weapon and tool that can be had.

This knife is also known as a Dheradoon, as many knives of this style were manufactured there for the Indian Army during WWII.

The WWII will usually measure 17" - 18" and have a mass of about 700 g.

WWIIkhuk.jpg


Me.
My only quandry here is that the pic is of 2 kukris that are not real ww2 kukris, but the HI copy, replicas or whatever, with fancy buttplates, cho creep etc.

................................................................................................
4faq quote
The M43 was designed as an update of the Mk II which was basically a WW I
design. The new knife had a stronger grip attachment system, a wider pommel
and better bolster design at the blade. The balance is slightly more forward
and the blade could arguably considered stronger.

& W. 1 3/4+ lbs"

Me.
I have handled enough mk2 & m43s to know that I have had a WW1 mk2 with a wider pommel than any of my m43s.
Generaly I would say on the 10 or so m43s I have handled the balance point has fluctuated.

Personaly I havent found a 1 3/4 pound m43 yet. I have seen a lot just under 1 1/2 pounds in weight.
.....................................................................................
5,faq quote.
Here are some examples from just post WW II, made for an officer or senior NCO in the Gurkha regiments that stayed in India after independence. It may have been made by a contractor who had supplied issue kukris.

Me.
I have one which was back in England by spring 1946, Indian independance was 1947 .I bought it of an RAF bomb disposal corparels son. You told me it couldnt be of that date so I rang the mans widow who confirmed that it was one of the trophys her husband brought back & that he sailed from India in late 1945.

...........................................................................................

6. me,
I have seen a photo taken in France in 1915 of an unblued Jodhapir kuk & another of the said kuk in a normal type scabbard, so I wonder if the flimsy loop scabbards are for cerimonial use.
The photos are in 2 different books belonging to a freind, I will try & get copies of the books for your info.

7.
I think I also pointed out I seem to remember that , A Burma veteran says the Pioneer was a copy of the Chin knife. & sent you a photo of the chin badge showing a very similar blade.

............................................................................................
8,faq quote
2. WW I scabbards aren't found with frogs in many cases because they were made of web material and were required to be turned in upon leaving the army as part of all the whole 'kit'.

Me.
I have an issue ww1 mk2 with original leather frog & have seen several others.

9.faq quote
.4. If the scabbard is covered with canvas or webbing it was probably a WW II
piece used in the CBI Theater. The European Theater saw 'naked' scabbards. WW I
scabbards rarely had complete coverings.

Me.
I have seen photos of cloth covered scabbards in Europe, during ww2.
Unfortuantly the photos are not in my currant posetion.

Hope this is helpfull JP, I do understand that the on going study of any subject is important, If I look at encylopaedias from the 1950s & 1960s, with todays knowledge they are quite amusing.

Nothing is ever perfect whatever you write, I am sure some futre fact will show up & teach us all something new. Thats what knowledge is like. & thats OK. IMHO

My intial 50% of kukri knowledge came from my discusians with you & without that sound grounding, my thirst for kukri & kukri knowledge may not have continued in the way it has.

I will be one of the first to buy your book. I look forward to it greatly.

Best of luck,

Cheers,
Spiral

Edited to hopefully improve clarity.
 
"Much was written years ago and I know there are descriptions that definitely need revising and while I have changed things for my book..."

Before Beo left I asked him to remove almost ALL of my stuff in the FAQ and rely on the things written for the book. I suggest you all do the same. Much of what was found ""wrong" falls into that category plus the picture showed isn't mine nor are many of the comments.

I'm very interested to see these pictures that a friend of Spiral has. I didn't know there were any color photos taken in WW I that would indicate a polished blade vs a blued one. Couldn't just be reflection by any chance?
 
Back
Top