Richard
BOUNCED EMAIL: I need to update my email address in my profile!
- Joined
- Oct 3, 1998
- Messages
- 1,742
Hello, got a few observations here, then a question. I remember several years ago when production companies followed custom makers and began using ats34. At that time many people sang the praises of these companies, and said from first hand knowledge that factory ats34 knives were the best thing since bottled beer. Now, many of those people seem to be alloy addicts, and the only good steel to them is whatever new one comes out on a given day. The very same people that said ats34 would hold an edge for 6 months, they find a new favorite and turn around and say ats34 sucks and never holds an edge. They like to make blanket statements about a type of steel...which leads to the article I want to ask about.
In a back issue of Combat Knives, there is an article by Ross Seyfried on hunting knives. In the article he talks of edge retention...and makes the blanket statement that 440C on a scale of 1 to 10 rates a 5, and calls the steel a dead end. He then goes on to say that damascus wont work either. He further states that in stainless steel that about the only one to be considered is ats34.
Now, I myself have had knives in several steels. I have had good quality aus6/8 knives that show better edge holding than poorly done ats34...and vice-versa.
Is it really fair for people to make those kind of statements...such as 440C is bad and ats34 is the best, without considering the quality of heat treat and workmanship and such? Just curious. Thanks.
------------------
Richard
icq 61363141
Just some knife pictures
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=110070&a=4518795
In a back issue of Combat Knives, there is an article by Ross Seyfried on hunting knives. In the article he talks of edge retention...and makes the blanket statement that 440C on a scale of 1 to 10 rates a 5, and calls the steel a dead end. He then goes on to say that damascus wont work either. He further states that in stainless steel that about the only one to be considered is ats34.
Now, I myself have had knives in several steels. I have had good quality aus6/8 knives that show better edge holding than poorly done ats34...and vice-versa.
Is it really fair for people to make those kind of statements...such as 440C is bad and ats34 is the best, without considering the quality of heat treat and workmanship and such? Just curious. Thanks.
------------------
Richard
icq 61363141
Just some knife pictures
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=110070&a=4518795