The thing that bothers me is one manufacterer *cough*Benchmade*cough* can charge literally twice the price for LESS steel compared to, say, Ka-Bar, CRKT, et cetera.
Specifically, which models were you comparing?
Which Ka-bar were you comparing to which Benchmade?
Which CRKT were you comparing to which Benchmade?
What gives Benchmade, Spyderco, ect such a rep when they don't appear to have any measurable advantage.
The key term here seems to be
MEASURABLE ADVANTAGE.
I don't think that anyone can make a blanket statement saying that "Spyderco, or Benchmade, always performs better than brand XYZ".
But I can say that Spyderco has certain models that perform much better than the average knife in certain categories.
For example:
When it comes to unlined plastic/nylon-handled single-blade locking folders...Spyderco simply cannot be beat.
And when it comes to dual-lined,
G-10 scaled,
lockback folders...does Spyderco have ANY competition???
And Benchmade has some superior models as well...
I think that the Griptilian is one of the best production knives ever.
The same goes for the 710.
This does not mean that other companies cannot compete at all...they just need to be better in other categories.
For example:
The humble Buck 110.
When it comes to the traditional pouch carried,
American made,
wood and brass, lockback hunter, that is affordable to the average Joe...who can compete with the legendary Buck 110???
And NOBODY makes a better multi-functional slip-joint than Victorinox!
CRKT also has some excellent products...
Kit Carson's M16, M18, and M21 lines are all very nice...if you like liner-locks (which I don't).
But if I was looking for a strong
inexpensive liner-lock, I would definitely consider them.
As someone once said:
Use what you like.
Like what you use.