J. Doyle
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2008
- Messages
- 8,181
This, like most topics, I'm sure has been brought up before so I apologize if it has. But it's new to me so bear with me. 
I've noticed a couple disturbing trends, mostly on the forums, lately and it raises some observations and maybe some questions.
I watch the "Exchange" forum quite a bit and even post a couple knives there for sale occasionally. I like to see what's selling, who's selling and buying, for what price and how quickly. It is an ongoing attempt to help me with my own pricing, a very difficult aspect of being a knife maker for a living.
Trend #1: If a knife doesn't sell in the first go around in the exchange, often after a day or two only, the seller drops the price, sometimes drastically.
Trend #2: There are makers of all different quality levels that offer knives for sale at a fraction of what they are worth in the current market.
As for trend #1, does this make buyers and collectors just have a 'wait and see' mindset? It seems so prevalent that I wonder if that's what collectors come to expect-- That the price starts high and makers are always willing to come down in price. Pricing is difficult for me even though I try to price my knives fairly. I don't personally know of any makers that are just gouging prices because they can and don't know too many that could even if they wanted to (though I'm sure there are some).
Trend #2 is almost more disturbing to me than trend #1. With the second scenario, a maker may have a different full time job (or working spouse) that pays the bills so if their sales cover their material costs, they're happy. This really seems like it hits the full time makers hard. In this trend, you can be very good at marketing and pricing your wares appropriately, and when you post something on the exchange, you're still likely behind the eight ball anyway because of a hobby maker undervaluing his time and craftsmanship. The other side of this coin is that there are makers that charge much more than the knife is actually worth. I think the market pretty much weeds these out all on it's own fairly quickly. I try not to be guilty of this too and I think that most makers that are trying to make an honest living at this usually aren't WAY high on their prices. Maybe a little bit but nothing too extreme.
Kind of tied in- I've heard comments about my knives and some of my knife maker friends' knives like, "I like that knife but it's way too pretty or fancy to use." Or it's too expensive. So you make something less expensive by knocking off details and embellishments and utilize more 'field grade' working finishes and then the same people don't like it because it doesn't have all the nice features of your other knives. Or worse yet, the say "Why would I pay $xxx dollars for a no frills, belt finished g-10 handled user when I can get a forged damascus or san mai blade with a guard and spacers and ironwood handle for only $20 more than $xxx?" Which leads us back to Trend #2.
Do these trends dictate the collecting market? A full time maker trying to make a living has it pretty rough when he has stripped away all the elements that he can to produce a still good looking and performance driven piece that's priced at his rock bottom point, only to have it still priced higher (or almost higher) than some hobby maker's nicer pieces.
I'd love to hear input from anyone but especially some seasoned maker's views on how to overcome these scenarios and from some collectors on how these trends dictate the market price, if they do at all.

I've noticed a couple disturbing trends, mostly on the forums, lately and it raises some observations and maybe some questions.
I watch the "Exchange" forum quite a bit and even post a couple knives there for sale occasionally. I like to see what's selling, who's selling and buying, for what price and how quickly. It is an ongoing attempt to help me with my own pricing, a very difficult aspect of being a knife maker for a living.
Trend #1: If a knife doesn't sell in the first go around in the exchange, often after a day or two only, the seller drops the price, sometimes drastically.
Trend #2: There are makers of all different quality levels that offer knives for sale at a fraction of what they are worth in the current market.
As for trend #1, does this make buyers and collectors just have a 'wait and see' mindset? It seems so prevalent that I wonder if that's what collectors come to expect-- That the price starts high and makers are always willing to come down in price. Pricing is difficult for me even though I try to price my knives fairly. I don't personally know of any makers that are just gouging prices because they can and don't know too many that could even if they wanted to (though I'm sure there are some).
Trend #2 is almost more disturbing to me than trend #1. With the second scenario, a maker may have a different full time job (or working spouse) that pays the bills so if their sales cover their material costs, they're happy. This really seems like it hits the full time makers hard. In this trend, you can be very good at marketing and pricing your wares appropriately, and when you post something on the exchange, you're still likely behind the eight ball anyway because of a hobby maker undervaluing his time and craftsmanship. The other side of this coin is that there are makers that charge much more than the knife is actually worth. I think the market pretty much weeds these out all on it's own fairly quickly. I try not to be guilty of this too and I think that most makers that are trying to make an honest living at this usually aren't WAY high on their prices. Maybe a little bit but nothing too extreme.
Kind of tied in- I've heard comments about my knives and some of my knife maker friends' knives like, "I like that knife but it's way too pretty or fancy to use." Or it's too expensive. So you make something less expensive by knocking off details and embellishments and utilize more 'field grade' working finishes and then the same people don't like it because it doesn't have all the nice features of your other knives. Or worse yet, the say "Why would I pay $xxx dollars for a no frills, belt finished g-10 handled user when I can get a forged damascus or san mai blade with a guard and spacers and ironwood handle for only $20 more than $xxx?" Which leads us back to Trend #2.
Do these trends dictate the collecting market? A full time maker trying to make a living has it pretty rough when he has stripped away all the elements that he can to produce a still good looking and performance driven piece that's priced at his rock bottom point, only to have it still priced higher (or almost higher) than some hobby maker's nicer pieces.
I'd love to hear input from anyone but especially some seasoned maker's views on how to overcome these scenarios and from some collectors on how these trends dictate the market price, if they do at all.
Last edited: