I want to buy an Mcusta knife because I want something with a Damascus blade for my collection and I really like the look of Mcusta handles (I don't have anything in damascus, so that is a hole in my collection right now). At a bit over 100 bucks, they look like a great deal, and I have heard they are good knives, so I know they will be good quality.
My question is how do they compare to knives like the SERE 2000, Manix, and Military, which are about the same price?
By paying extra for that damascus, do I lose quality and performance versus knives of the same price? How much do I lose?
I ask because I would also like to buy a SERE 2000 and am wondering what the quality and performance difference between it and a similar priced Mcusta will be.
I don't mind if the Mcusta will be a bit "worse" than the SERE 2000, as I am getting the damascus blade. But I want to make sure the Mcusta will still be a good knife for the price, damascus aside.
Thanks in advance.
My question is how do they compare to knives like the SERE 2000, Manix, and Military, which are about the same price?
By paying extra for that damascus, do I lose quality and performance versus knives of the same price? How much do I lose?
I ask because I would also like to buy a SERE 2000 and am wondering what the quality and performance difference between it and a similar priced Mcusta will be.
I don't mind if the Mcusta will be a bit "worse" than the SERE 2000, as I am getting the damascus blade. But I want to make sure the Mcusta will still be a good knife for the price, damascus aside.
Thanks in advance.