Mike Williams "River" Damascus Bowie

Joined
Feb 15, 2002
Messages
1,705
Some knives are not only fun to own, but fun to photograph too. I posted an image of this knife taken 8 or 9 months ago with a camera I no longer own but got the urge lately to re-shoot it. It's a beauty and my newer camera/lens set-up is much sharper.

orig.jpg


Here's the older pic.

orig.jpg
 
Cool - a nice new pic for my "favorite bowies" file. :D Mike has the whole bowie thing seriously dialed in.

Roger
 
That 'river' or more electric 'lightning bolt' is the most compelling visual aspect on this piece. It just directs your eye to travel up and down the length of this piece.

I really like the second photo with some perspective. Wow!

Coop
 
A seriously fantastic bowie - :eek:

Mike Williams is one of the very best when it comes to this style - he puts them together perfectly. I have seen the older pick before and must confess to having this, and Ari's (megalobytes) massive Williams in my top ten.

The photo's are great Buddy.

Stephen
 
Damn, that's a beauty. The new photo is much sharper, but it is interesting to note that the blade appears longer in the original photo.
 
I love his river bowies. They're great.

What I don't understand is that the 2 pics look like pics of different knives. Like a set: a stubby, stout bowie, and a long-bladed one.
 
that is a awesome looking knife, you photo skills are awesome too! Paul
 
Joss said:
I love his river bowies. They're great.

What I don't understand is that the 2 pics look like pics of different knives. Like a set: a stubby, stout bowie, and a long-bladed one.

It's probably a question of perspective - different camera angles can make quite a difference in how long the blade looks. The 1st photo (where the blade looks shorter) almost looks as if it were shot with the handle closest to the camera and then inverted. Of course, that's just a guess. But generall speaking, shooting the knife "handle first" will visually "shorten" the blade.

Roger
 
Looking back at the first shot I see the problem. It's not quite as simple as it appears. I *guarantee* that the knife was shot in portrait mode and then rotated 90* CCW. :D

See for yourself. Twist your head and it all looks correct.

If it really was shot in this perspective, the blade would have been closer to the eye and look longer. Tch-tch....! ;)

Perspective is a good tool. I regularly choose whether I wish to embellish the blade or the handle by utilizing the distortion that perspective attains.

Coop
 
Coop is correct. Look at the guard. If the guard obscures the joint between blade and guard, then the camera is closer to the handle. If the joint is visible (or should be, but for shadow) then the camera is closer to the blade. When the camera is perfectly alligned in a verticle plane relative to the guard, and perpendicular to the blade, then perspective is accurate and neither blade nor handle will be exaggertated. But that usually means a boring picture, to my eye anyway. We often don't notice this phenomenon because we don't usually have different pictures of the same knife as is the case here.

Coop states that there is a 'problem' and I agree. The 'problem' is that my family does not appreciate that I AM A GREAT ARTIST! Therefore I am forced to work in a tiny little space in the basement. Positioning the lighting (I use softboxes, not strobes) is difficult. To get acceptable highlights and reflections is a challenge so sometimes I shoot in either 'portrait' or 'landscape' mode then rotate the image 90 degrees. I try not to let it show unless it enhances the image - which it can sometimes do by drawing the viewer's eye along a line through the image.

If my family recognized my true greatness I could set up my gear in some more suitable place in our home! I would also probably get to park my car in the garage in place of all those bicycles, skateboards, dog food and holiday decorations - and I would not have to mow the grass myself! Alas, they don't. All I get around here is what Chris Rock said the man of the house always gets, "The big piece of chicken." Yep, they always save the big piece of chicken for good old dad.
 
They're both good pics, I usually prefer to exaggerate the length of the blade, but, not always.

I'd post my pics of a sweet Williams bowie, but, they suck, and were taken a few months back, before, I, like you, became a great artist, unappreciated, in fact, barely tolerated at home, and, I still get the small piece of chicken, if I'm lucky. :)
 
Back
Top