Mini persian vs the full sized?

[rpn]

I had the mini for a minute- while I loved the blade, I struggled with the handle. I just couldn't hold it comfortably with the size and curves.

How does the full size compare? Any thoughts are welcome! :thumbup:

 

[The Deacon]

I find the C83 more comfortable than the C105, perhaps because the grip on it is very similar to that of the Stretch. I get a very solid four finger grip without using the choil.

Paul

My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Kiwimania ---- Spydiewiki
Dead horses beaten, sacred cows tipped, chimeras hunted when time permits.
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
It's easy to grin when your ship comes in and good fortune and fame are your lot, but the man worthwhile is the man who can smile with his shorts twisted up in a knot. - Morey Amsterdam

 

[dialex]

Full size is the real deal!

 

[bh49]

I have large hands and C83 Persian give me very comfortable and secure grip. To obtain the same grip with C105 Mini Persian I have to use choil. I can be wrong, but I treat these two knives quite different. C83 is my "cut anything knife". C105 is gents knife, which I use for lighter cutting, where I do not need such secure grip. Still C105 is very well build and capable knife.
Get both if you can. There are no better knives than Schempp's Persians.

 

[rpn]

Thanks guys! That comparison pic clears up a lot for me...

 

[Josh K]

I end up not liking smaller knives. I had a Delica and found it dimunitive. Same with a Mini Grip, Small Sebenza, I'm sure I'd end up the same way with the C105. I ended up with the bolstered / G-10 Sprint and I'm very happy with it. Still hasn't pushed my Umnumzaan out of my EDC pocket, but it's a great knife.