Mini-RSK Mk1 vs Native

Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
58
Benchmade Mini-RSK Mk1 vs Spyderco Native

(Edited 2005-11-24, changes marked in red.)

I'm relatively new to knife nuttery: I've EDC'ed a knife for just over a year and a half. For the past 9 months, my EDC has been a Benchmade Mini-RSK Mk1 (aka Mini Ritter Grip), with which I've been very satisfied. Last week I bought a Spyderco Native (Walmart special), expecting to gain an inexpensive, high-quality backup knife. I was surprised to find that that the Native significantly outperforms the Mini-RSK Mk1 in some ways, and it has now joined my EDC rotation.

Superficially, these two knives are quite similar: an S30V drop-point blade just under 3", a handle just under 4", and a weight just over 2.5 oz. Both feature an ambidextrous lock.

mrsk-native-open_scaled.jpg

(Native on top, Mini-RSK Mk1 on the bottom)

The two most significant differences are the lock and the ergonomic features.


Lock:
I like the RSK's Axis lock much better than the Native's back lock.

The Axis lock is super quick and easy to open and close one-handed, by simply flicking the wrist. You never have to put your fingers in the path of the closing blade.

The Native's back lock is almost as easy to open one-handed (by levering the blade out using the hole), but it's much slower to close one-handed. I shift my grip back so that my index finger is in the front indentation in the handle. The thumb depresses the locking lever, and the blade is flicked half closed, stopping when the blade choil hits my index finger. Then I shift my grip again, to get my fingers out of the way, and close the blade the rest of the way by pushing on the spine with my index finger.

Not nearly as quick or satisfying as the Axis thwack. The RSK wins this comparison with one hand tied behind its back. <snort>


Ergonomics:
This was the big surprise for me. The RSK has a nice enough grip, but the ergonomics of the Native puts it way ahead of the Mini-RSK Mk1 in actual use.

The handles on both the RSK and the Native fit about three fingers, but the Native's choil provides room for the fourth finger. A four-finger grip on a 4" (closed) folder is fantastic.

On the RSK there is about a 5/8 inch "dead space" between the front of the index finger and the beginning of the cutting edge. On the Native there is only about 3/16 inch when using the choil. This makes a noticable difference in usability and control.

The Native sacrifices 1/2 inch of blade to the choil, leaving 2.6 inches of cutting edge. The RSK has 2.9 inches cutting edge. For what I use a pocket knife for, both are plenty.

Added 2005-11-24! The Native uses an opening-hole, the RSK has a thumb stud. I liked the stud well enough until I tried the hole - now I'm a hole guy. (I re-wrote and re-wrote that trying to get rid of the sexual connotations, but gave up...) The hole never, ever catches on your pocket when putting the knife in or taking it out. The stud doesnt catch often, but it does happen. I haven't gotten cut that way yet, but it always makes me nervous. Getting the Native out of my pocket is slightly but noticably easier, since I dont have to angle it to keep the stud from catching the fabric.


Misc minor stuff:
The RSK cost me $100 plus shipping & waiting, the Native cost $40 at the Walmart down the street...

When closed, the tip of the RSK rests well inside the handles whereas the tip of the Native rests just a little bit below the level of the handles. This felt a bit exposed and disturbing at first, but it has never been a problem. I'm pretty much over it now. ;-)

Both knives came scary sharp, and the blades lock up tight with no play, vertical or horizontal.

Both knives have a textured area for the pad of the thumb, which is very nice.

The Native rides a little higher in the pocket than the RSK does. Not a big deal to me.

The Native is a tiny little bit bigger than the RSK, again not a big deal.

Added 2005-11-24! The fit and finish of the RSK is flawless. The fit and finish of the Native is good (totally acceptable), but not up to the level of the RSK. My Native has some roughly finished spots: around the opening-hole, the front guard of the choil, and the lock. Nothing that compromises performance, but it's not the shiny smoothness of the RSK.


Conclusion:
Please, Spyderco, license the Axis lock and make an Axis Native!

Or, Benchmade & Mr Ritter, put a finger choil on the RSK Mk2 folder!

mrsk-in-hand-0_scaled.jpg
native-in-hand-0_scaled.jpg


REDO-mrsk-in-hand-1_scaled.jpg
native-in-hand-1_scaled.jpg
 
Dude, that was a great review and good pics too. I have both knives as well. I am currently carrying the Native and have the mini-RSK in my survival pack. I think that you make a good point about the lack of a finger choil on the RSK but I also think that the handle extension serves to 1. keep your finger from slipping forward and 2. protect your finger from what you're cutting (get splinter when whittling, etc.)
The very end of the tip of my mini-RSK was missing when I got it so it has always bugged me a little so I will probably carry the Native for now.
Adam
 
A well done review, Sprokker!
I liked it and agreed with all that's said.
I just love the Native.
The RSK is no slouch...BUT the Native!!!! ahhhhhh

Keep the reviews comin
Thanks
well written and lots o pics!
Tom
 
Good job reviewing. I don't have either one opting to use my Benchmade Stryker Auto Rescue (some think its really ugly but it is a great "cutter" with that big serrated blade).

I liked your pictures and way you compared the various features. I'm also a fan of axis locks.
 
For me, they're pretty even....the axis lock and blade shape on the RSK I really like....I think the blade shape on the RSK is much more practical than the shape on the native...the native's real pluses are its looks, its price and its ergonomics....I don't trust lockbacks very much, but I'll probably buy a native nonetheless...
 
That's a very nice review. I really like the Native, and ever since getting my first Spyderco I stopped buying knives with a thumbstud. I also like the handle shape, it's one of the best handles out there for me.

However, I don't like the blade shape of the Native all that much. I used one in CPM 440V as my main EDC for years, but I very much prefer a flat grind nowadays. I also don't like the false edge anymore. I've still got two Natives, but I rarely use them anymore.

Hans
 
I have both. They are excellent knives. I would prefer the Native for SD and the RSK for camping. You really do need to buy both of them.
 
Nice review! I like both knives, and each have thier good and bad. Bottom line for me is I like the axis lock on the RSK, but oh, the Native is a sexy knife. I would have to get both.
 
Thanks a lot for the review!
I am currently on the market to buy a EDC knife (lost my Delica) and this review is really useful for me!!! I would like to ask you, guys, for advice.
Until now, I narrowed my choice for my next EDC knife on Benchmade Mini-RSK Mk1, Benchmade Griptilian or Rat Trap. Now I guess I need to include Native into the list too. However, I need a bit more information before I make my final decision.
Could you, guys, answer these questions:
1. Comparing Benchmade Mini-RSK Mk1 with Spyderco Native, which one do you think performs better in the kitchen - peeling vegetables, cutting, making salad etc? I have not owned a knife with thumb stud, but have suspision stud may trouble me a bit if I peel vegetables.
2. Which one in your opinion is more comfortable to cut tree branches and for general wood carving?
3. Which one do you think is better as EDC knife, but the one which will be comfortable for countryside as well?
If you could give me advice on Rat Trap or Griptilian (what they are in comparison to the other two knives) that would be great.
I found my Delica was great to carry, but not convenient in use, especially cutting tree branches. Quite a city knife which hates kitchens.
Regards,
 
That was a great review, I had to go out and by a native after reading it. I am very impressed with it so far and the S30V is razor sharp. It will most likely be replacing my BM mini grip (not a rsk model) as my EDC. I just recommended a mini grip to someone else as an EDC but think I will be retracting that statement, and for the money, I dont see how you could do better than the native. Thanks again.
 
My ex liked my Native II so much I just had to pass it on. Since then she's gotten 5 more knives (3 Spydies).

I've tried to replace the native with numerous knives and guess what . . . it just can't be replaced. I currently carry a Delica and while it's a wonderous little knife, the Native was/is so much more. The fit in my hand, the slim profile, the razor sharpness . . . BAH need another Native.

Btw, my old Native II was in 440V and it seems to be a little harder to find than the regular version.
 
OmegaA: The mini-RSK and the Native both have short blades. Fine for peeling, but not so good for chopping and cutting big stuff. I like a blade at least 1.5 or 2 times as long as the longest cut I need to make. The sub-3-inch blades on these knives are great for carrots, sausage, steak, etc, but no good for bigger things like eggplant, onions, etc.

Both do about equally well at chopping & cutting thin branches, and both are lousy at chopping thicker branches - for that I use these knives in more of a carving mode, which works but is slow. The Native is a better whittler because the choil lets you get your hand really close to the edge, which gives you great control. But the mini-RSK is no slouch either.

I'd be happy carrying either one in the woods, though I'd also want a 4 or 5 inch fixed blade like this or a small hatchet! And a Stihl 290!

FWIW, I carry the Native now, the mini-RSK lives in my bag-o-goodies in my backpack purely as a backup. This is the opposite of what I thought would happen when I bought the Native! :D
 
Thanks, Sprokker, for spot-on answers which I was looking for!
I see it came down to how I like the look of the knife, the rest is quite equal - I'm happy with both locks, finish, steel material.
Thanks again!
 
Back
Top