Miniature Nepalese Khukuri, A Visual Review

Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
580
Visual review of a Nepalese manufactured miniature khukuri knife (Kagas Katne/Paper Cutter):



I ordered this knife around the same time that I ordered a few Biltongs khukuris (but from a different vendor). I ordered it and the two Biltongs because I kinda liked the idea of having some miniatures being represented in my newly started khukuri collection.
Yesterday I received both the Biltongs and the miniature khukuri. Though I was not happy with the two Biltongs (explained in a separate review), I was very happy with the miniature.
The knife is Nepalese made, but I do not know the source in Nepal that manufactures it.

The scabbard is what many may consider the bling bling type (excuse the modern description). What I mean is that it would be considered a bit gaudy by most American knife enthusiast standards. It’s made using the typical leather over wood with brass tip, but it goes further than that. It also has brass along it’s sides, a brass strap towards and around the blade entrance area, and a couple of rows of brass tacks along it’s front. Gaudy, but somehow cute. No defects were found on this scabbard and the knife fit snug inside of it.

Anyhow, though kind of cute, it’s not the scabbard that impressed me. What was refreshing was the very decently manufactured mini khukuri knife itself. The blade was free of any rust and has a nice polished finish. The blade also has a very nicely done blade grooves (one on each side). There were no fractures anywhere on the blade, including the cho/kaudi area. The buffalo horn handle and brass bolster have no fractures of any kind and are both very nicely polished. The handle’s grooves are also very well done, much better than on the two full size Khukuri House Service #1 & #2 knives that I had previously received and not kept because of defects (again, explained in another review).

I did not know exactly what to expect from this little knife. I just figured that the knife’s blade would have the correct side view profile, but would probably just be a real flimsy facsimile of a khukuri knife. Well, that was far from what I received. This knife not only has the side view profile of a khukuri, but even when looking at it from it’s spine view, the knife truly replicates a full size khukuri. Except for it not having a pommel, it very much has the appearance of a scaled down Service #1 khukuri. The photo links below will better explain my description (a picture is worth a thousand words comes into play here). The size of the blade is about 3 7/8” and it’s handle is about 2 ½”. The knife has a sharp edge, not razor sharp, but most definitely sharp.

I won’t even try to understand why this no name brand $10 + $3 S&H miniature khukuri knife is so much more carefully made than the other full sized khukuri knives that had previously been sent to me by another vendor. So this knife that was purchased more as a ha-ha for my collection, is right now the crown jewel of my khukuri collection. Though I’m very happy with this knife, It’s sad that what is supposed to be a toy-ish object, has more quality behind it then some full sized offerings by some of the so called “established khukuri firms”.

Here are a few photo links of this mini khukuri (the cell phone and quarter will give you an idea of the knife’s size):


http://img384.imageshack.us/img384/9089/dscn04000pc.jpg

http://img384.imageshack.us/img384/9730/dscn04027hz.jpg


This knife was purchased from the World Knives company. I purchased it via one of their ebay auctions for $10 plus $3 shipping, but it's also available directly off of their website for $19.99 plus shipping. As of this writing, the item is again being offered on one of their ebay auctions ($9.99 opening bid). Here is their company website:

www.worldknives.com
 
JimmyJimenez said:
I won’t even try to understand why this no name brand $10 + $3 S&H miniature khukuri knife is so much more carefully made than the other full sized khukuri knives that had previously been sent to me by another vendor.

Interesting comparison, the khukuris are made by different people and at that price level there is likely little inspection before sale thus you can likely expect to see a large variance in finish from one to the next.

-Cliff
 
Yes, I perfectly understand that variations are to be found from one knife to the next, but I'm speaking more of defects, not slight deviations.
Though the mini has what are considered to be signs of a handcrafted item, it has no defects. I'm sure if you buy three or four of these, one will find obvious differences between them. Maybe one will even find a slight defect, but I did not need to buy many or look too far to find defects (quite a few of them) in the full size Khukuri House products (which cost 4 to 5 times as much as these no name minis).

Here are some of the major differences between the previously received Khukuri House Service #1 & #2 models compared with this no name brand mini khukuri knife:

***Blade:
Service #1 had cho fractures
Service #2 had cho fractures "and" a spine fracture
Mini has none of the above

***Handle:
Service #1 had two handle fractures
Service #2 had no handle fractures
Mini has no handle fractures

***Rust:
Both Service #1 & #2 had freckled rust
Mini has no rust

***Handle grooves:
A bit sloppy on Service #1
Better on Service #2
The Mini's executed grooves are much more refined then on either knife above

Visually speaking, the mini wins hands down over the other two, though I'm sure it would not do quite as well in a head to head chopping contest... LOL! ;)

I don't know what Kami(s) made this knife, but there was obvious pride taken in making it.
Maybe your right, it may be that I was just lucky on this purchase. After not being so lucky on my other recent khukuri purchases, I'm glad some good luck finally came my way :)
 
I think your expectations are high for these tools. Though most people like the aestetics of the khukuri they're tools. As tools, especially handmade, there will be variances. I love khukuri's because their not all perfect machine made objects, they all have individual differences.
 
I believe one of the problems is that what one person considers a defect, another may consider a perfectly acceptable deviation (and vice versa).

Here are some of the things that "I" consider to be defects or otherwise unacceptable conditions:

*cho/kaudi or other blade area fractures/cracks
*fractures/cracks in handles
*noticable handle fills to correct flaws (like epoxy or wood fills)
*rust, especially if it's enough to etch the steel

All the above can be acceptable if the seller has fully informed the potential buyer of the defect(s), therefore there being no surprises (as Himalayan Imports does when selling their seconds).

Now, here are some of the things that "I" consider to be acceptable handcrafted item deviations/variations:

*blade thickness deviations
*blade length deviations
*polishing marks
*some file marks
*handle thickness deviations
*handle length deviations
*wood or horn handle color and/or pattern deviations
*cho/kaudi placement and shape deviations
*slight blade grind deviations
*weight deviations
*some metal surface ripples
*slight brass accent deviations

In any case, if my standards can be met on this $10 khukuri knife, then it can surely be the standard on khukuris costing $40, $60, $80 and up. If that is too much to ask, then yes, it may be that my standards are too high (though I truly believe they are not).
On the other hand, it may also be that others have their standards set too low.

As in any case, opinions will vary :)
 
JimmyJimenez said:
Yes, I perfectly understand that variations are to be found from one knife to the next, but I'm speaking more of defects, not slight deviations.

Yes, no arguement here, there should be no cracks in the blade, this isn't a cosmetic issue. Thanks for the details, some of the issues you mentioned I would not care about, but for a collector point of view they are critical and this is an obvious part of the market.

-Cliff
 
Back
Top