The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
100% agree. There's no way I would pay 135-175 bucks for that! That's crazy for a SAK clone! It looks cheap too.don't care for the price.
I dunno, for "premium" steel and micarta, it doesn't sound so bad.100% agree. There's no way I would pay 135-175 bucks for that! That's crazy for a SAK clone! It looks cheap too.
At the price they're asking, they need to at least figure out how to make it look "premium". It looks like made in china junk to me. When you have an established brand like victorinox to be compared with, then you'd better not be slacking. Vics are well trusted, well loved, and a lot less expensive. If your angle is to be the premium option then you should make your product look like it.I dunno, for "premium" steel and micarta, it doesn't sound so bad.
Me, I'm good with cellidor, alox, and rostfrei
It's made in ItalyAt the price they're asking, they need to at least figure out how to make it look "premium". It looks like made in china junk to me. When you have an established brand like victorinox to be compared with, then you'd better not be slacking. Vics are well trusted, well loved, and a lot less expensive. If your angle is to be the premium option then you should make your product look like it.
Fine, but it still looks way too much like the cheap chinese made SAK clones that you see everywhere. I have one that looks very similar to it.It's made in Italy
I've got no skin in the game, but it doesn't look cheap to me. Here is a larger image from KC. Not trying to be argumentative.Fine, but it still looks way too much like the cheap chinese made SAK clones that you see everywhere. I have one that looks very similar to it.
No worries, it's not personal.I've got no skin in the game, but it doesn't look cheap to me. Here is a larger image from KC. Not trying to be argumentative.
Look at Boker Tech tools instead, if you like AEB-L.
LOL, I was thinking the first thing I'd do is turn that into a plain edgeNo worries, it's not personal.
Yup, still looks like a cheap clone to me. I didn't catch the serrations though. That's interesting at least.
Also fairly heavy from what I've seen/heard. But the quality is supposedly decent. Incidentally, I think there's at least some of them being made in china if I'm remembering correctly. Or was that only the Ruike LD series?G10 scales, screws, steel pivots, clip and tough steel.
Also fairly heavy from what I've seen/heard. But the quality is supposedly decent. Incidentally, I think there's at least some of them being made in china if I'm remembering correctly. Or was that only the Ruike LD series?
When I read things like this it makes me shake my head in total disbelief. Honestly, I don't get it. To each their own, I guess.I don't think the price is all that bad for what you get.
Check out the Ruike LD31 and L31 (non-locking version). The scales are g10 and it has nearly that exact tool set.I'd rather have an awl in place of that small blade, and I could do without the saw completely.
What don't you get about the price? It's a premium blade steel, which can't be punched out of a sheet of metal like Victorinox's can. So, it's going to take more work to produce a finished blade. They're using Micarta scales, which costs more to manufacture than cellidor handles. It's produced in Italy, not China, which means higher labor costs. It's a retailer exclusive, which means they're going to have a much lower production volume than pretty much any Victorinox model out there. It's expensive, yes, but like I said, not as much as I would have expected.When I read things like this it makes me shake my head in total disbelief. Honestly, I don't get it. To each their own, I guess.
Check out the Ruike LD31 and L31 (non-locking version). The scales are g10 and it has nearly that exact tool set.
Inline awl, scissors, knife, bottle opener w/flat driver, corkscrew, rope/strap cutter w/2d phillips on the end. You also get a glass breaker and tweezers. There's no can opener though, and the phillips is a bit awkward to use because the rope cutter sits at an odd angle (the angle is to make cutting rope easier)
I don't see the value in using expensive blade steel in a multitool. It makes zero sense to me. And I don't see how anyone else could see value in that either. It's a multitool, not a dedicated folder or a fixed blade. It's totally absurd to me. On top of that, the thing looks like a cheap piece of junk. It's like they put zero thought towards distinguishing it from any cheaply made garbage clone aside from slapping micarta scales on it. I can't respect that at all, especially when you look at the ridiculously high price tag on it. My immediate reaction is to say "What don't you get about the price? It's a premium blade steel, which can't be punched out of a sheet of metal like Victorinox's can.
When Victorinox pulls stupid crap like that I'm always right there pointing it out too, and I will often have people dumping on me for it. What you're talking about would be a niche product with very limited sales. It would not appeal to 95% of Victorinox's typical consumer base, and they already know that very well, which is probably the biggest reason why they don't do it.I'm willing to bet that if Victorinox ever used a different blade steel and used Micarta handles it would cost just as much if not more.
That's often true (though sometimes it already starts out looking bad) and I am definitely not a fan of companies moving their manufacturing to a country such as china. We can at least agree on that. I have so much to say about that subject and it is really hard to hold my tongue so that I am not breaking any rules.In my experience, the Chinese made stuff always looks great at first, but just never seems to hold up as well, even when it's supposed to be made of higher end materials.
I will never drive a luxury car, with leather heated seats, wood accent panels, and machined aluminum wheels. But some people will pay for that stuff, even demand it. Horses for courses.I don't see the value in using expensive blade steel in a multitool. It makes zero sense to me. And I don't see how anyone else could see value in that either. It's a multitool, not a dedicated folder or a fixed blade. It's totally absurd to me. On top of that, the thing looks like a cheap piece of junk. It's like they put zero thought towards distinguishing it from any cheaply made garbage clone aside from slapping micarta scales on it. I can't respect that at all, especially when you look at the ridiculously high price tag on it.
I am really glad that you made this point, because it underscores the need to make your product look like it is actually worth its price tag. When people buy expensive luxury cars, you can visually see the difference. It's usually very obvious. This is in fact one of the main reasons why a lot of people do it. It's a status symbol. They are flaunting their wealth. It's as if to say "Look at me. I'm important. I can afford to spend this kind of money on a car." Another thing you get for that premium price tag is all kinds of extra features. I'm not seeing that here. I'm just seeing another bog standard slipjoint swiss army knife clone with leaf spring scissors. The tools look identical to all the other clones out there.I will never drive a luxury car, with leather heated seats, wood accent panels, and machined aluminum wheels. But some people will pay for that stuff, even demand it. Horses for courses.