This from the Sioux Falls Argus Leader:
"The state Supreme Court poked a hole Thursday in Minnesota's zero tolerance school weapons law, overturning an Anoka boy's felony conviction for getting caught with a pocketknife.
In a unanimous decision, the court said merely having a knife in school is not enough to warrant a conviction. Instead, justices ruled that prosecutors must prove some measure of criminal intent or that the boy knowingly brought the weapon to school.
The ruling is a blow to the 1993 law that broadened a ban on guns in school zones to include all weapons. The law made it a felony punishable by up to two years in prison and $5,000 fine for anyone who "possesses, stores or keeps a dangerous weapon" or uses or brandishes a replica firearm on school property.
The objective was to create safer schools and make laws regarding weapon possession consistent.
But Justice Edward Stringer, writing for the court, said not all items classified as weapons should be treated equally.
"We observe that knives as common household utensils are clearly not inherently dangerous."
Sanity returning?
DaveJ
"The state Supreme Court poked a hole Thursday in Minnesota's zero tolerance school weapons law, overturning an Anoka boy's felony conviction for getting caught with a pocketknife.
In a unanimous decision, the court said merely having a knife in school is not enough to warrant a conviction. Instead, justices ruled that prosecutors must prove some measure of criminal intent or that the boy knowingly brought the weapon to school.
The ruling is a blow to the 1993 law that broadened a ban on guns in school zones to include all weapons. The law made it a felony punishable by up to two years in prison and $5,000 fine for anyone who "possesses, stores or keeps a dangerous weapon" or uses or brandishes a replica firearm on school property.
The objective was to create safer schools and make laws regarding weapon possession consistent.
But Justice Edward Stringer, writing for the court, said not all items classified as weapons should be treated equally.
"We observe that knives as common household utensils are clearly not inherently dangerous."
Sanity returning?
DaveJ