Monarch Handle Modification

Comprehensivist

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2008
Messages
3,250
After reading the great reviews and comments of the Monarch by Will (“xxwjtxx”) and Brian (“mistwalker”), I knew that I had to get one. It seemed like the ideal combination of blade shape, length, and height along with a taller but shorter handle than some of my favorite models.

Here are my thoughts and experiences with this model so far:

Left-hand view of the knife as new:



Bottom view to show the handle contours:



Top to bottom: Hiking Buddy, Monarch, Bushcrafter

The Monarch does a nice job of splitting the size difference between the two. I like the pointier spear point on the Monarch along with the taller blade and handle versus the Hiking Buddy.



The Monarch has an old-fashioned Coke bottle type handle shape that has a narrower “waist” below the center palm swell, then flares out at the pommel end.



Here is the Hiking Buddy stacked on top of the Monarch to show the difference in blade height.



Here is another stacked view to show the differences in handle height between the Hiking Buddy and the Monarch.



Here are a couple of shots of the Monarch over the Bushcrafter to show the difference in pommel shapes. Notice the Bushcrafter’s continuous flowing curve versus the angular corners and square edges on the Monarch.





Here are the similar views with the Hiking Buddy. The handle on the Monarch is noticeably taller and more angular at the pommel than the Hiking Buddy.





What I discovered in comparing these knives is that the Monarch seems well designed for this grip because the sharp corner on the pommel locks in tight at the joint of my thumb. Since I seldom if ever use that grip, that feature is not important to me.



On one of the grip holds that I do use regularly, the sharp corners on the pommel are a big negative to me because they dig into my palm. If the handle was longer, I might not notice. Unfortunately, due to the compactness of the handle length (which I like a lot), Those sharp corners a noticeable problem for me.



Normally, when a particular Fiddleback knife doesn’t feel subjectively “right” or “do it” for me, I quietly move it on to the next happy customer. Because there is so much that I like about the Monarch, I was faced with a dilemma about what to do with this knife. I want to keep this knife as a primary user, so I decided to take the unprecedented step of modifying the pommel. Sacrilege it may be on a $300+ knife, but I want my tools to fit me and be comfortable and efficient in any way I need to use them.

I decided to modify the top part of the pommel into a round butt. Here is another photo to showing the difference between the round butt on the Hiking Buddy over the angular shape of the Monarch.



I traced out a before and after sketch of the desired handle modification. I taped up the blade and most of the handle to protect me and most of the knife from any accidental damage. I took the knife (along with goggles and a respirator) to the aerospace machine shop where I work. Even though I am not a professional machinist or grinder myself, I managed to accomplish the basic shaping I wanted on a 1” x 60” belt grinder. From there, it was back home to my garage for more shaping, sanding, and polishing.

Here are a couple of in-process photos in between sanding steps.





I compared the finished modification to the curves on my initial plan sketch and it came out pretty close.



Here are some after modification photos.









Here is an after modification in-hand shot. The round butt is more comfortable to me and it no longer digs into my palm in this grip.



Here is an end view of the modification.



I’ll close out with a “hasco” shot looking through the bullseye.



I am very happy with the way this modification turned out. This knife is now a personalized tool for me. It fills a niche in my collection that I didn’t know that I had and it is definitely a keeper. I still love my Bushcrafter and Arete, but the Monarch is just about the optimal size user for me.

Even though I like the way my project turned out, I must caution you that there are a number of major pitfalls to consider before you think of modifying your knife, including:

1) You may injure yourself in the process.
2) You will void your Fiddleback warranty.
3) Your will seriously lower your resale or trade value.
4) You may not have the skill, equipment, and/or patience to do this and yield a good result.
5) You may FUBAR your expensive knife and regret it for all time.
6) You will make Andy question your sanity for messing with his design.

I shared this project for information purposes only. I didn’t take this project lightly at all. Modifying Fiddleback knives is not a thread topic that you will see very often at all because they are so well designed and handcrafted to start with.

Let me know what you think. Good, bad, or indifferent.

Thanks,

Phil
 
Awesome job Phil. I think it's a good thing when someone has the pineapples to modify an expensive tool that they love rather than to get rid of it :)
 
Very informative review, Phil. Thanks. And well done on the mod. Think that turned out really well.
 
I'm sure many of us have held a knife and said to ourselves....If only. From a functional standpoint given your preferred grip I'd say that you achieved a significant improvement in the handle ergos. Kudos on achieving a good cosmetic appearance as well. It certainly took some courage to tackle a project of this nature given your investment in the knife. Thanks for sharing the comparison photos, as well as, the before & after shots :thumbup:

Post script: Did this project receive the J-Dog seal of approval ?
 
Last edited:
Phil,

First of all, Bravo! I'd say you completely achieved your objective. Your work is well done, and it looks natural on the knife--a real accomplishment. Like you, the grip that model seems designed for is not a preferred one for me. My Esquire doesn't dig in too badly, but I don't work it as hard as I would a Monarch.

Second, until seeing your pictures, I never realized how Bushcrafter-ey the Monarch blade actually is. And that got me wondering something else. I wonder how close your finished product is to the new Bushcrafter Jr. If one ever passes through your hands, I do hope you will do some comparison photos with your "King Phil" (see what I did there? 😉).

Again, nicely done.


Michael
 
Awesome write up Phil; I'm digging the new ergos and handle redesign; it looks like a gem and fit I and finish are perfect! Good job my friend :thumbup:
 
The Monarch design was informed by a philosophy of use similar to the Sneaky Pete family, at the crossroads of bushcraft, utility, and defense. Andy has mentioned the strength of the reverse grip with the Monarch as part of its integration into that family. With these modifications, you have a blade very similar ergonomically to the hiking buddy. I definitely appreciate the original for what it is, and I can also see the spirit by which you implemented your vision for this blade. I will think of it as the BC Monarch.
 
Last edited:
That took some cajones but great work :-) Thanks for the review and pics. This really cements the need for a BC and maybe a BC Jr in my mind.
 
Hey Phil, any chance you could do some Photochoping and give us a pic of the Monarch before and after in the same frame with the bullseye lanyards lined up so we can see just how much you took off?

Thanks!
 
Well done on the mod. The same handle issues you had are the reason this line of knives doesn't hold much interest for me. I like the blade shape however and I think your mod made for a very useful knife. :thumbup:

I too have modded a Fiddleback; the handle of my original machete has been worked over with two files, sandpaper, and scotch-brite. Hard to tell from looking at it but now I can use it for hours without hand fatigue.
 
That turned out incredible Phil! Very nicely done.

I feel the same way as Phil about the original end shape of the monarch handle. The blade shape and length of the monarch is just about perfect for a lot of tasks. Although I have not modified any of my fiddlebacks, this was the first one I considered trying it on. The blade shape and size are too nice to dismiss just because the handle is not quite right for my preferences. I used the monarch for an extended time last weekend and overall it is a great model. If I were to draw up my own version, I might add a little length to the handle as well.

Thanks for the great post. I appreciate how you covered all that could go wrong and I am happy that yours turned out so good. If I get the courage to modify mine I will post the pics.
 
Interesting to see your thoughts, and I do get them. That is exactly the reason the KEB and Bushcrafter have my favorite handles for Bushcraft. I carry the Monarch as an edc, in a mostly urbanized environment, and carried: reversed, inside belt, strong side, I really love how my thumb locks down on that point when drawing in an overhand grip. It just feels extremely natural, like an extension of my own hand, and very secure. It's one of the reasons the Monarch usurped the Bushboots position of my edc :)
 
Awesome job Phil. I think it's a good thing when someone has the pineapples to modify an expensive tool that they love rather than to get rid of it :)

I appreciate the feedback Hector.

Very informative review, Phil. Thanks. And well done on the mod. Think that turned out really well.

I am glad that you enjoyed the read Kris. Thanks for the compliment.

I'm sure many of us have held a knife and said to ourselves....If only. From a functional standpoint given your preferred grip I'd say that you achieved a significant improvement in the handle ergos. Kudos on achieving a good cosmetic appearance as well. It certainly took some courage to tackle a project of this nature given your investment in the knife. Thanks for sharing the comparison photos, as well as, the before & after shots :thumbup:

Post script: Did this project receive the J-Dog seal of approval ?

Thanks Peter. Once I decided to do this modification, I knew that I had to take some before and after photos to document the change. I am happy with the outcome.

Thanks for asking about J-Dog. She sat out this project because she couldn't bear to watch and I couldn't find a respirator and goggles to fit her head. ;)

Phil,

First of all, Bravo! I'd say you completely achieved your objective. Your work is well done, and it looks natural on the knife--a real accomplishment. Like you, the grip that model seems designed for is not a preferred one for me. My Esquire doesn't dig in too badly, but I don't work it as hard as I would a Monarch.

Second, until seeing your pictures, I never realized how Bushcrafter-ey the Monarch blade actually is. And that got me wondering something else. I wonder how close your finished product is to the new Bushcrafter Jr. If one ever passes through your hands, I do hope you will do some comparison photos with your "King Phil" (see what I did there? 😉).

Again, nicely done.


Michael

Thanks for acknowledgement Michael. I agree that the Monarch blade is very well suited for bushcraft activities which is part of why I like it so much. I am sure that I will get a Bushcrafter Jr. at some point and I will post some comparison photos when I do. I guess that I am slow today, so you are going to have to explain the "King Phil" reference to me.

Awesome write up Phil; I'm digging the new ergos and handle redesign; it looks like a gem and fit I and finish are perfect! Good job my friend :thumbup:

I appreciate your feedback and approval Will. It was your great review of the Monarch that got me fired up to get one.

The Monarch design was informed by a philosophy of use similar to the Sneaky Pete family, at the crossroads of bushcraft, utility, and defense. Andy has mentioned the strength of the reverse grip with the Monarch as part of its integration into that family. With these modifications, you have a blade very similar ergonomically to the hiking buddy. I definitely appreciate the original for what it is, and I can also see the spirit by which you implemented your vision for this blade. I will think of it as the BC Monarch.

Thanks Vayu. That is a good summation of Andy's design philosophy for this model and I agree that it is a good crossover design. My modification was strictly based on my personal preference and intended uses rather than an attempt to bag on Andy's design in any way.

Phil
 
Oh no you di'int!
When I saw the vice... I thought Oh no!!!!

Don't worry LavaWood. It is out of focus in the picture, but I used rubber faced aluminum vice inserts in addition to layers of masking on the blade to protect the knife in the vice. I definitely didn't want to add any rough vise jaw "Phil-dle-texturing" to the flats of the blade.

That took some cajones but great work :-) Thanks for the review and pics. This really cements the need for a BC and maybe a BC Jr in my mind.

Thanks for the comments necrolicious. I am glad that the comparison photos helped give some clarity about what you want to buy.
I'll take it!

Here you go David.

Phildleback Friday 02-20-15:
2012 0220 001 BC Monarch ("one of a kind") with black & burgundy burlap over black & white pinstripe, tapered tang, 5/32" spalted O-1. $1,000
Please paypal direct to the SuperBen Fund.

Hey Phil, any chance you could do some Photochoping and give us a pic of the Monarch before and after in the same frame with the bullseye lanyards lined up so we can see just how much you took off?

Thanks!

I have no photoshopping skills Luke. Maybe the Kardashians could jump in to help out with that since they are experts at it. My goal was to create a continuous curve from top of the handle to the bottom section of the pommel. The blue line on my outline photo is a pretty close representation.

Phil
 
Well done on the mod. The same handle issues you had are the reason this line of knives doesn't hold much interest for me. I like the blade shape however and I think your mod made for a very useful knife. :thumbup:

I too have modded a Fiddleback; the handle of my original machete has been worked over with two files, sandpaper, and scotch-brite. Hard to tell from looking at it but now I can use it for hours without hand fatigue.

Thanks trestle. I would like to see photos of your machete handle modification. I have heard that the new handles are different that the old ones.

That turned out incredible Phil! Very nicely done.

I feel the same way as Phil about the original end shape of the monarch handle. The blade shape and length of the monarch is just about perfect for a lot of tasks. Although I have not modified any of my fiddlebacks, this was the first one I considered trying it on. The blade shape and size are too nice to dismiss just because the handle is not quite right for my preferences. I used the monarch for an extended time last weekend and overall it is a great model. If I were to draw up my own version, I might add a little length to the handle as well.

Thanks for the great post. I appreciate how you covered all that could go wrong and I am happy that yours turned out so good. If I get the courage to modify mine I will post the pics.

Thanks for the nice comments Tod. I am not encouraging anyone else to follow in my footsteps on this project. I waited a month before I was sure about what I wanted to do. (Your Black Ash Burl Monarch is gorgeous by the way.)

Interesting to see your thoughts, and I do get them. That is exactly the reason the KEB and Bushcrafter have my favorite handles for Bushcraft. I carry the Monarch as an edc, in a mostly urbanized environment, and carried: reversed, inside belt, strong side, I really love how my thumb locks down on that point when drawing in an overhand grip. It just feels extremely natural, like an extension of my own hand, and very secure. It's one of the reasons the Monarch usurped the Bushboots position of my edc :)

I always appreciate your comments Brian. You were the other influence that caused me to pursue getting a Monarch. You and I have different primary uses for this knife and each is valid. One thing that I did notice about your Monarch is that it has larger radius edges on the sides of the pommel than mine came with. Seeing that made me start thinking about modifying mine.

Thanks again everyone!

Phil
 
Thanks for acknowledgement Michael. I agree that the Monarch blade is very well suited for bushcraft activities which is part of why I like it so much. I am sure that I will get a Bushcrafter Jr. at some point and I will post some comparison photos when I do. I guess that I am slow today, so you are going to have to explain the "King Phil" reference to me.

Maybe the problem is that I was too tired when I made it. The model is the. "Monarch" and you made it yours, so (Monarch = "king") + Phil = the "king Phil" model. Seemed funny at the time.

Don't worry, I won't quit my day job. :D


Michael
 
Nice work Phil. No secret I'm a fan of the HB/BC/Arete family. I really like your mod and have commented before that a rounded but on the Monarch would be very handy knife. Of course, I think I'm just going to buy a BC Jr. instead of modifying a Monarch.... ;):D
 
I always appreciate your comments Brian. You were the other influence that caused me to pursue getting a Monarch. You and I have different primary uses for this knife and each is valid. One thing that I did notice about your Monarch is that it has larger radius edges on the sides of the pommel than mine came with. Seeing that made me start thinking about modifying mine.

Phil

I did note with interest that your's was more squared off than the one I have here. I know Andy does tweak handles over time, the two Bushboots I have here are different. Mine has the thumb cap peak, which I'm good with, but the wife's is an older one that does not...and she likes her's better. Lol, I have a fat thumb, I might actually like that squared pommel better, I'll have to check one out at Blade and see.
 
Back
Top