- Joined
- Feb 3, 2009
- Messages
- 1,342
I got the MDF board and 1 micron Blue Diamond Honing Spray problem sorted out. I still don't like the MDF as much as leather or legal pad cardboard with the diamond spray, though. Nevertheless, I am thrilled with the 1 micron spray in general and am now curious about getting loco with 0.5 and possibly even 0.25 micron spray. Hand American is still down. I've looked elsewhere and found a ton. Also running into some contradictory claims and science regarding the monocrystaline vs. polycrystaline diamond issue.
I started a thread about this same subject a few months ago and nothing conclusive emerged... just opinions, although most seemed convinced that monocrystaline (the kind DMT champions) were "better." But all of those perspectives and reports were concerning diamond hones, laps, plates, etc. -- i.e. diamonds embedded in a substrate. Apparently the mono can be embedded in the nickel better and doesn't break/wear down as quickly as poly. Fine. But how does this translate to diamond sprays, compounds/pastes, slurries, etc.?
The research I'm digging up seems to overwhelmingly suggest that poly is better than mono in these types of applications, and the price difference reflects that (some distributors offer both, in either oil or water base
). I will throw you guys a couple links to check out and maybe some comments and opinions will be generated.
The mono vs. poly info. on this site can be found near the top, under the subheading, "Diamond Products".
http://www.kemet-met.co.uk/polishing.asp#lub
This whole PDF doc is dedicated to the difference of the two, with an interesting bar graph on the second page.
http://www.metallographic.com/Newsletters/PC-diamond-newsletter3.PDF
I started a thread about this same subject a few months ago and nothing conclusive emerged... just opinions, although most seemed convinced that monocrystaline (the kind DMT champions) were "better." But all of those perspectives and reports were concerning diamond hones, laps, plates, etc. -- i.e. diamonds embedded in a substrate. Apparently the mono can be embedded in the nickel better and doesn't break/wear down as quickly as poly. Fine. But how does this translate to diamond sprays, compounds/pastes, slurries, etc.?
The research I'm digging up seems to overwhelmingly suggest that poly is better than mono in these types of applications, and the price difference reflects that (some distributors offer both, in either oil or water base
The mono vs. poly info. on this site can be found near the top, under the subheading, "Diamond Products".
http://www.kemet-met.co.uk/polishing.asp#lub
This whole PDF doc is dedicated to the difference of the two, with an interesting bar graph on the second page.
http://www.metallographic.com/Newsletters/PC-diamond-newsletter3.PDF