- Joined
- Jan 4, 2008
- Messages
- 8
I've been collecting, drawing and designing knives for years. I plan to start making them once I have the space to install a home forge. My normal design philosophy is "utility, not hostility". Kinda cheesy, but it sums everything up my preference for blades that are primarily tools. An ink pen and a hammer can both be adapted to weapons, but it's not there primary function.
I wanted to start a discussion about whether or not there is room for moral philosophy in knife design, or if it is best left to form following function. I admire and own a few tactical knives, and I think a true "tactical" knife is one that best represents both the tool and weapon aspects. A "fighter" is one that is primarily a weapon. If you look at the CRKT Hissatsu, it is designed as a weapon from the ground up. It's strong point, thick spine, curved edge, and narrow blade width are designed specifically for slashing and penetration. You'd have a hard time trying to use it for much else. Now lool at a BK2: thick spine, but with a wide blade, partially straight edge, and comparatively blunt point mark it as primarily a working knife.
So. Is there room in knife design for morality? Or do form and function cover it? You wouldn't try to stab someone with a sheep's foot blade, but if you were designing a knife for stabbing, you wouldn't use a sheep's foot in the first place. If I'm trying to design something with a conscious eye towards it not being used as a weapon, am I limiting myself? Am I limiting the design? A reinforced point is handy for a multitude of tasks, but it's also very good for stabbing. Then again, if someone is in a desperate situation, they aren't going to think about intended purpose. They will use whatever is handy to defend themselves.
What are your thoughts?
I wanted to start a discussion about whether or not there is room for moral philosophy in knife design, or if it is best left to form following function. I admire and own a few tactical knives, and I think a true "tactical" knife is one that best represents both the tool and weapon aspects. A "fighter" is one that is primarily a weapon. If you look at the CRKT Hissatsu, it is designed as a weapon from the ground up. It's strong point, thick spine, curved edge, and narrow blade width are designed specifically for slashing and penetration. You'd have a hard time trying to use it for much else. Now lool at a BK2: thick spine, but with a wide blade, partially straight edge, and comparatively blunt point mark it as primarily a working knife.
So. Is there room in knife design for morality? Or do form and function cover it? You wouldn't try to stab someone with a sheep's foot blade, but if you were designing a knife for stabbing, you wouldn't use a sheep's foot in the first place. If I'm trying to design something with a conscious eye towards it not being used as a weapon, am I limiting myself? Am I limiting the design? A reinforced point is handy for a multitude of tasks, but it's also very good for stabbing. Then again, if someone is in a desperate situation, they aren't going to think about intended purpose. They will use whatever is handy to defend themselves.
What are your thoughts?