- Joined
- Mar 18, 2006
- Messages
- 520
I made a reasonable search but didn't hit on it, so if there a similar discussion, please direct me.
Lately, I've wondered why my unreasonable pursuit of a "best and favorite knife" (within my cost constraints) takes me in so many different directions. One of my thoughts is that there are endless new developments and combinations to consider. Conversely, tradition is a strong attractant. The evolution of the knife from chipped rock to the latest synthetic ergonomic cad cam locking coated supersteel one-hand folder is mostly to blame, but seems to only borrow from advances in non-knife technology. So I began thinking of modern innovations (within the last century or so) unique to knives and their purposes. The locking folder goes back aways, and it is only a method to make articulation rigid. Most supersteels are created for a different purpose, synthetics are everywhere, etc.
I can think of only one modern innovative feature not derived from non-knife technology that has become a common factor in defining the modern knife.
My vote goes to the Spyderhole. It works, requires no extra parts, is instantly recognizable, and was (as far as I know) an original solution to opening a blade. Am I missing something (or a lot of somethings)?
I will appreciate any thoughts others may have on the subject to further clog my idle mind. Regards, ss.
Lately, I've wondered why my unreasonable pursuit of a "best and favorite knife" (within my cost constraints) takes me in so many different directions. One of my thoughts is that there are endless new developments and combinations to consider. Conversely, tradition is a strong attractant. The evolution of the knife from chipped rock to the latest synthetic ergonomic cad cam locking coated supersteel one-hand folder is mostly to blame, but seems to only borrow from advances in non-knife technology. So I began thinking of modern innovations (within the last century or so) unique to knives and their purposes. The locking folder goes back aways, and it is only a method to make articulation rigid. Most supersteels are created for a different purpose, synthetics are everywhere, etc.
I can think of only one modern innovative feature not derived from non-knife technology that has become a common factor in defining the modern knife.
My vote goes to the Spyderhole. It works, requires no extra parts, is instantly recognizable, and was (as far as I know) an original solution to opening a blade. Am I missing something (or a lot of somethings)?
I will appreciate any thoughts others may have on the subject to further clog my idle mind. Regards, ss.