Mtech Bowie (Trail Master rip-off) Destruction Test

Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
515
This is my first destruction test.

I figured that since this knife only cost me £22 I would lose much less in monetary value than I'd gain in knowledge. I haven't tested my Busse knives in this way... I'll let Noss keep doing that.

I bought this knife because I've always liked the Trail Master design and the Mtech version got some very kind reviews from a Mr Cliff Stamp, whose scientific brusqueness has upset many a knife manufacturer. And it was cheap. Very Cheap!

My initial impressions with this knife were that it is more or less an exact replica of the Trail Master. I don't think it's unkind to Mtech to call this a stolen design. Of course the bowie shape isn't unique to Cold Steel, and in many ways the Trail Master was a modern update of the Randall 12-9 bowie, but this is just a straight copy.

It should be pointed out that quality control is a lot lower than more expensive knives. The join at the guard/handle area is not perfect. Also the primary grind was slightly off. However, all of these issues can be negated if you simply go into a bricks and morter store and buy it in person, or email the online retailer ad ask that they do a quick check.

Aaaaaanyway, back to the test! (pics at bottom of post)
===========================================================================================================
Part 1.Throwing
First of all, I spent yesterday afternoon throwing this against my fence. When it failed to stick it regularly fell onto stones in the soil with no damage at all. At one point i missed the fence altogether and it ent over into the neighbours pile of broken bricks. No problems. I also climbed a tree in the garden and did some chopping and throwing it into the soil from a height. Again not a very strenuous test, and there were no problems.

Part 2. Hitting/stabbing screws and nails
I got bored of this and so I decided to stab it into a wooden board full of old screws and nails and deliberately tried to hit the screws with full force. One of these hits caused a dent in the tip of the blade about 2 or 3mm long but only about 0.1mm deep

I then tried to chop about 6 or 7 nails but without a hard surface underneath it merely bent them. This caused minor impactions on the blade, again no more than about 0.1mm deep, so nothing major.

This morning I decided to chop nails but this time do it on my anvil. This time the nails were easily chopped into bits. Again this caused minor impactions (NOT CHIPS) along the blade, again only about 0.1mm deep.

Part 3. Obligatory concrete chopping
Chopping breeze blocks was quite easy and didnt really do anything to the blade edge apart from dulling. I suspect that my breeze blocks are softer than the ones used by Noss in his tests. This is when I decided that I should try and chop concrete paving slabs. (probably quite a bit harder than Noss's blocks, as mine were full of pebbles and harder concrete) This caused some denting and dulling but still no chipping.


Chopping sheet metal steel
Finally I decided I wanted to see whether the Mtech could take chopping through 4mm sheet thickness mild steel, like in Noss's tests (this is my favourite of his tests) It managed this with localised denting certainly less than 0.2mm deep and narrower than the width of the sheet metal. This metal looks to have been an almost identical thickness to Noss's. I was really impressed by this!

I should point out that I throughout this testing I was hitting it on the spine with my Blacksmithing ballpein hammer, and as you can see from the photos the spine is fine, with some slight paint missing, but no noticeable denting.

I also hammered the tip through the same metal. This fractured the rubber on the butt, and impacted the tip slightly, but nothing major


My thoughts so far

I'm actually quite impressed. This knife is quite genuinely one of the toughest knives I've ever see in action. Like I said I haven't 'destroyed' any of my Busses, they're just too expensive. I do know that they are very tough, but I know from experience that even they will roll or dent if they hit a stone. It should also be pointed out that the Busse Skinny Ash which Noss uses to successfully chop metal bars with has a much thicker edge than this Mtech, as he has reprofiled the edge upwards to remove the choil.

I am NOT claiming that this Mtech is in any way a superior or even equal to premium brand knives. Premium brands will have far superior QC. Busses are set about 58RC ad so are about 2 or 3RC points higher. Because of this the Busse will hold a better edge. The edge holding of the Mtech is ok, but nothing to boast about. Cliff Stamp suggests it is similar and perhaps slightly superior to Mora 12c27 blades in terms of edge holding. (I should point out that it will still 'cut' paper, but it is not smooth due to the 'serrations' which have been caused by impactions. Impressive really...)

Where this knife DOES excell is toughness and stain resistance. 440A (a much maligned and misunderstood steel) has about 0.5% carbon (as does INFI from Busse) which I suspect is one of the major reasons for the oustanding chip resistance. It does however have a large amount of Chromium and so is one of the best steels for use around salt water. Cliff Stamp in his reviews on youtube explains why this steel is actually very tough

As I said the Mtech isnt as hard as a Busse, however it is decently hard. In fact it's probably a couple of points harder than Randall knives in 01, and harder than many Kukris. Would I want a folder RC'd at 55/56?? -- Probably not, but in a large blade it's just fine. It's certainly not THAT soft as you'll see from how little denting it took from chopping mild steel

I can't imagine a better rough tough beater bowie to be honest, especially if you are in a line of work that may involve being in and around salt water, or where your gear may become regularly encased in mud, gunk or water for an indefinate amout of time

To be continued

As you can see it isn't broken yet, but I wont stop until it is. Will keep you posted, let me know if you thik of any other tests you'd like to see!

After Pics!!!!!

utf-8BU3RyYXRmb3JkLW9uLUF2b24tMjAxMjEyMTMtMDAzMTUuanBn.jpg


utf-8BU3RyYXRmb3JkLW9uLUF2b24tMjAxMjEyMTMtMDAzMTYuanBn.jpg


utf-8BU3RyYXRmb3JkLW9uLUF2b24tMjAxMjEyMTMtMDAzMTcuanBn.jpg


utf-8BU3RyYXRmb3JkLW9uLUF2b24tMjAxMjEyMTMtMDAzMTguanBn.jpg


utf-8BU3RyYXRmb3JkLW9uLUF2b24tMjAxMjEyMTMtMDAzMTkuanBn.jpg


Sorry that the pics aren't the best -- I only have a phone camera
 
Last edited:
ive never understood why people need to attempt to destroy a knife before they are "impressed"
 
To see the quality? Then you know how well built the knife is. I've been thinking of a kukri from Mtech, would the 440A be any good for chopping? I'm a bit wary of the steel.
 
I see what your saying Woody. But what is this knife supposed to be for?

The answer I'm looking for is "playing" :)
 
Woody: The point you make gets made on every one of these type of threads, and I don't particularly want this to descend into that. In many ways you're right! For a small knife that is only going to cut and slice wear resistance is paramount. But with a large blade that is going to be used for heavy chopping, possibly including bone and frozen wood, it's useful to see what the margin of error is. If it doesn't chip, or break on me in these tasks, I can be quite confident it wont break on me when I'm just chopping wood.

I'm also man enough to admit that there's a boyish fantasy that wants to know what the knife would be capable of in a 'survival scenario'. This is indulgent, but so are many other things in life, and at 20 bucks this is not an expensive extravagance!

Minibear: I can't speak for the Kukri, but this 440A is great for hard use and chopping. It is not a brittle steel, it was fine for chopping frozen wood yeterday. The Mtech bowie has actually gathered a little bit of a gathering elsewhere and I'm not the first to give it a tough workout -- one guy on bladesandbushcraft forum shot his with a 380 and it survived apparently

Check out a more scientific review from Cliff Stamp: http://www.cliffstamp.com/knives/reviews/mt_151.html
 
Last edited:
Woody: The point you make gets made on every one of these type of threads, and I don't particularly want this to descend into that.

Little warning from a guy who has been here a while....It's going to probably descend into that. Once you open a thread...where it goes is out of your hands. Mine never go the way I want! :D
 
Marcinek: You are probably right! Hopefully people will appreciate that I am only trying to highlight the fact that this is an incredibly tough knife, regardless of cost. This isn't just a good knife for the money, this is a good knife full stop. And I'm not one of these guys trying to say 'my $75 knife is as good as your $400 custom knife'. I've owned various high end knives including a Busse Battle Mistress, and I just wanted to show that this Mtech is a great knife in its own right.

more pics;

tip after being hamered through steel sheet (about 4mm thick sheet)
utf-8BU3RyYXRmb3JkLW9uLUF2b24tMjAxMjEyMTMtMDAzMjMuanBn.jpg


Can still (sort of) slice paper
utf-8BU3RyYXRmb3JkLW9uLUF2b24tMjAxMjEyMTMtMDAzMjAuanBn.jpg


Close-up of edge which cut through steel
utf-8BU3RyYXRmb3JkLW9uLUF2b24tMjAxMjEyMTMtMDAzMjIuanBn.jpg
 
Mastiff: I've see that on a couple of online stores, however I suspect theyre wrong since even in the pictures they use both the box and the blade have 440 written on them!
 
I should add that I put a edge back on this knife last night, and it took me only five minutes to put a edge back which would slice paper.. not bad at all
 
You are correct: not bad at all. Two of these knives that I personally own have been used and abused. The fit/finish is not on par with the original Trailmaster nor are the grind lines as good. What I do like about the knives is the fact that they hold a reasonable edge and don't seem difficult to sharpen. I would not think twice about letting a young scout troop take these out for an excursion in the woods. All the strident beatings from the kids would be no problem for this tough piece of steel.

At this lower price point, I honestly think you are going to be hard pressed to beat them. The added bonus of being stainless makes me never worry about them in moist environments. Again, Mtech makes a good product that will probably fare just as well as a knife costing five times more.
 
followed the cliff , i bought one mtech151, very good one, just have a flaw that the blade crooked a little bit .

you did great ! i really enjoy your tests , cool.



ps:" It should also be pointed out that the Busse Skinny Ash which Noss uses to successfully chop metal bars with has a much thicker edge than this Mtech, as he has reprofiled the edge upwards to remove the choil. "

hi, the initial edge on skinny ash1 from factory is dull& thick .Noss does not put a thick edge on it.He call it combat edge just normal angle. noss is a member here , you can ask him for the edge thickness on it via pm .

As i knew that the cheap than dirt bowie noss had tested was made in the same factory which your mtech151 was made in and CTD bowie labeled with 440 stainless that is the same steel used on mtech151.

so called 440 stainless is a chinese steel not U.S 440 Stainless ,& it performed very differ from your U.S. 440 stainless.

Chinese version 440 stainless(i do not know what really it is , just tempoarylly call it) is very tough , it will deform but chip when it get hit (impactaion) .
 
Last edited:
Back
Top