- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 4,421
There are a lot of different things going on here and you may comment on any of them if you like.
These are final shots of the two daggers I did WIP threads about. This is some new stuff for me, please feel free to comment on what you like or what you think might have made these knives better, aside from my material choices maybe, we all have preferences. You know, the whole "One man's carp is another man's koi" thing.
Also, as an offshoot of the really good thread about knife photography, I was in a quandary as to what would be a better way to display these images; either in four shots total, two each of the montages and two each of the sheathed images, or two shots total, a combination of the two images in one shot. Please comment, if you prefer one over the other, or does it really matter?
This dagger has a blade of 1095 and 15N20 about 4 1/4 inches long. The handle is stacked kudu horn; the guard and bolster are carved, antiqued bronze. The overall length is 8 1/4 inches. The stone insets in the bolster and sheath are lapis lazuli. The sheath is tooled leather, I embossed the tooling with gold and antiqued it.
Which images do you like better? Coop went to extra trouble to make the top image work well on the web. Which would you use on your web site? Which would you use in your portfolio?
This is the dagger from the first WIP I did. You have seen the knife before but not these pictures. It has a blade of the same damascus pattern I used in the other dagger, it is of 1095 and 15N20 it is 6 1/2 inches long, the overall length is 11 1/2 inches. The guard and bolster are mokume and the handle is a mosaic pattern of bubinga and lace wood. The sheath has sea snake skin, barramundi skin and African porcupine quills.
Are you able to see everything you wanted to see in the first shot? Or do you like the second two better. Now that I have previewed my post I am thinking the two separate shots are better than the two combined.
I hope you like them, thanks for looking, and making comments.
These are final shots of the two daggers I did WIP threads about. This is some new stuff for me, please feel free to comment on what you like or what you think might have made these knives better, aside from my material choices maybe, we all have preferences. You know, the whole "One man's carp is another man's koi" thing.
Also, as an offshoot of the really good thread about knife photography, I was in a quandary as to what would be a better way to display these images; either in four shots total, two each of the montages and two each of the sheathed images, or two shots total, a combination of the two images in one shot. Please comment, if you prefer one over the other, or does it really matter?
This dagger has a blade of 1095 and 15N20 about 4 1/4 inches long. The handle is stacked kudu horn; the guard and bolster are carved, antiqued bronze. The overall length is 8 1/4 inches. The stone insets in the bolster and sheath are lapis lazuli. The sheath is tooled leather, I embossed the tooling with gold and antiqued it.
Which images do you like better? Coop went to extra trouble to make the top image work well on the web. Which would you use on your web site? Which would you use in your portfolio?
This is the dagger from the first WIP I did. You have seen the knife before but not these pictures. It has a blade of the same damascus pattern I used in the other dagger, it is of 1095 and 15N20 it is 6 1/2 inches long, the overall length is 11 1/2 inches. The guard and bolster are mokume and the handle is a mosaic pattern of bubinga and lace wood. The sheath has sea snake skin, barramundi skin and African porcupine quills.
Are you able to see everything you wanted to see in the first shot? Or do you like the second two better. Now that I have previewed my post I am thinking the two separate shots are better than the two combined.
I hope you like them, thanks for looking, and making comments.