- Joined
- Apr 18, 2011
- Messages
- 487
Well, after picking up my first 110 last year and really really liking it, I started eyeing the 112 as a possible EDC option. The 112 would be perfect for any local ordinances that restrict blade length to 3" and is sized perfectly as a companion or substitute to my large Vantage. Guess what just arrived in the mail? 
The 112FG I received isn't quite as comfortable as my 110FG (that knife just absolutely melts into my hand), but it's very close. The positioning of the grooves further forward in the handle make the weight distribution feel very butt-heavy versus the more balanced feel I get from my 110. Aesthetically, the 112 seems snub-nosed in comparison to the 110, due to its different proportions.
Although I like the 110 more than the 112, I'm still pretty thrilled about having what is essentially a more pocketable and more compact 110 in my possession. I'm currently EDCing the 112 as a backup to my Vantage, and also just to fondle. There's something about the traditionally styled warm macassar ebony Dymondwood scales and the brass bolsters that feel...right.
Anyway, pictures! These are the two knives I'm carrying today and intend to EDC from this point forward:
The large Vantage and the 112 really are very comparable in size. The 112 is a little bit thicker and heavier, but the Vantage is a bit wider. The blades also have similar cutting edge profiles, though the 112 offers a sharper/pointier tip and the Vantage offers a bit more edge at the tip to cut with. It's kind of fun drawing parallels between the two knives, almost as if the Vantage were a more modern brother of the 112.
(now to sit back and wait for 110 Dave to offer his congratulations on my purchase of a girl's knife
)

The 112FG I received isn't quite as comfortable as my 110FG (that knife just absolutely melts into my hand), but it's very close. The positioning of the grooves further forward in the handle make the weight distribution feel very butt-heavy versus the more balanced feel I get from my 110. Aesthetically, the 112 seems snub-nosed in comparison to the 110, due to its different proportions.
Although I like the 110 more than the 112, I'm still pretty thrilled about having what is essentially a more pocketable and more compact 110 in my possession. I'm currently EDCing the 112 as a backup to my Vantage, and also just to fondle. There's something about the traditionally styled warm macassar ebony Dymondwood scales and the brass bolsters that feel...right.
Anyway, pictures! These are the two knives I'm carrying today and intend to EDC from this point forward:



The large Vantage and the 112 really are very comparable in size. The 112 is a little bit thicker and heavier, but the Vantage is a bit wider. The blades also have similar cutting edge profiles, though the 112 offers a sharper/pointier tip and the Vantage offers a bit more edge at the tip to cut with. It's kind of fun drawing parallels between the two knives, almost as if the Vantage were a more modern brother of the 112.
(now to sit back and wait for 110 Dave to offer his congratulations on my purchase of a girl's knife
