The Nata inspired design of this knife got me to thinking about the different philosphy beteen Eastern and Western tool design, especially knives. I was reminded of a conversation I had with a custom knife maker who is also a cabinet maker and finish carpenter by trade. He collects wood working tools, as only a skilled craftsman can. My how they must accumulate over the decades.
Anyways, the maker (Chudzinski) told me about the different designs in eastern tools, especially Japanese wood working tools. Hammers, chisels, skews, gouges, saws, scrapers, scribes, planes, all he described as being markedly different than what would be considered traditinal western tools.
He praised the designs, and claimed they were superior in many ways for the fine work he does. Eastern tools see to have a more form follows function philosophy than in the West. They seem less concerned with durability, nad more concerned with efficiency in performance, probably relying on user skill to replace the strength that comes from a tool being overbuilt.
I have seen this myself in Japanese cooking knives, and the designs they inspire.
Going back to the Nata design, I think it is a superior design to the Western style Bowie for a field knife. The western Bowies Clip, or even spear or drop point palce more of an emphasis on stabbing ability and have a more center balance, quicker in the hand. Perhaps this stems from the dual role of weapon/ tool that the large knife has played in Western history.
In contrast, the broad tipped blade, almost sheep footed, really looks like it would be more useful for the type of work typically done in the outdoors. The much broader tip leaves more metal out front, shifting the balance forward for greater chopping ability out of the same length blade.
For those that use their knives as a digging tool, the broad tip looks to be a much more efficient shovel.
I dont recall ever having to stab anything (besides a few shadows as a child) when I am in the woods, whether for recreation or practicing bushcraft skills. While a thin tip is nice for fine work, that is not the big knifes forte anyways, thus I carrya smaller knife or two. One of which is always a SAK. Much more efficent for fine work. Less tiring, does a better job.
Nice knife, Big Country had a similar one in their lineup
I would easily choose the Siegle knife over the Big Country. Easily. Better steel and handle material for hard use, and I would argue a better blade design.
Ken Warner is a pretty cool guy though, talked to him a few times on the phone. He is a knife lover as well, and I think he would choose the Siegle knife as well!
This is one of those knives that sticks in my head, I would love to get one, It is near the top of my list for knife purchases to make.