I have a few questions about difference between the Native FRN and Native SS concerning the lock strength and handle sturdiness.
1. I have read that the Native FRN has very strong (heavy duty) and reliable lock (claimed by Sal). Is the same true for the SS version?
2. Assuming that both locks, FRN and SS, are the same, how about the sturdiness of the handles? My guess is that the handles would possibly break (disconnect from the blade) because the pins would break, not the handles themselves. Of course, the SS handle could wear faster then the FRN one, or vice versa, depending on the way of using a knife.
I am considering to use Native as a light 3" SD folder (cf. the review by Fred Perrin, pointing the importance of the blade finger choil which significantly reduces the risk of knife closing during stabbing). For that purpose the lock reliability/strength are important to me. For the SD purpose, I do not consider the difference between the specific steel (VG-10 vs AUS-10) to be very important.
Regards,
Franco
1. I have read that the Native FRN has very strong (heavy duty) and reliable lock (claimed by Sal). Is the same true for the SS version?
2. Assuming that both locks, FRN and SS, are the same, how about the sturdiness of the handles? My guess is that the handles would possibly break (disconnect from the blade) because the pins would break, not the handles themselves. Of course, the SS handle could wear faster then the FRN one, or vice versa, depending on the way of using a knife.
I am considering to use Native as a light 3" SD folder (cf. the review by Fred Perrin, pointing the importance of the blade finger choil which significantly reduces the risk of knife closing during stabbing). For that purpose the lock reliability/strength are important to me. For the SD purpose, I do not consider the difference between the specific steel (VG-10 vs AUS-10) to be very important.
Regards,
Franco