Need help identifying this XM-18

Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
279
I just took this XM-18 3.5 non-flipper Hinderer in trade and I'm uncertain if it's a generation 2 or 3. I believe it has a spearpoint blade and the frame has a bead blast finish. Opinions are welcome as I am uncertain at this point which generation it is. Seems like a good, solid knife with really smooth action and rock solid lock-up. The blade appears just a hair off center but doesn't come in contact with the liner.
 

Attachments

  • DSC00806.JPG
    DSC00806.JPG
    27.6 KB · Views: 113
  • DSC00807.JPG
    DSC00807.JPG
    27.7 KB · Views: 96
  • DSC00808.JPG
    DSC00808.JPG
    18.6 KB · Views: 63
  • DSC00809.JPG
    DSC00809.JPG
    14.9 KB · Views: 63
Last edited by a moderator:
Yikes ! (No Edit) Beautiful piece, can't enlarge on phone for some reason.
 
Last edited:
Actually, and this is completely uneducated guesswork, from the hardware and thumbstud, I'd say gen 2
 
It should have the name on the blade if it's Gen2, something seems odd if it's spearpoint, I am thinking custom spanto. It is very nice!
 
It should have the name on the blade if it's Gen2, something seems odd if it's spearpoint, I am thinking custom spanto. It is very nice!

I believe it is a spanto as well, but it's not as pronounced as the others I've seen. There is no name on the blade.
 
It appears to be a gen 3. Gen 2s had "Hinderer" milled into the blade. If it's flat ground it's a production and if it's hollow ground it's a custom. It's all in the "XM-18 and XM-24 Knives - Generations, History and General Information" sticky written by Rich and located at the top of the forum.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't look hollow ground to me. And it looks like the blade was bead blasted?
My guess is Gen 3 production Spanto.
 
Been changing a few things with this beauty and I'm liking how it's looking. Added the translucent jade G-10 scales, bronzed anodized titanium stand offs and lanyard bead.
 

Attachments

  • DSC00851.JPG
    DSC00851.JPG
    27.6 KB · Views: 18
  • DSC00852.JPG
    DSC00852.JPG
    28.5 KB · Views: 13
  • DSC00853.JPG
    DSC00853.JPG
    30.8 KB · Views: 14
  • DSC00855.JPG
    DSC00855.JPG
    30.9 KB · Views: 13
  • DSC00854.JPG
    DSC00854.JPG
    32.9 KB · Views: 12
Back
Top