Need input on evolving knife design

Joined
Jul 31, 2002
Messages
2,959
Greetings, fellas. I figured I'd ask some input from all you guys, and see what we come up with.

I've been thinking about my big bowie, and what I could do to improve or change it. For reference, this is what it looks like- this is what I'm comparing to.
attachment.php

I may not go the direction I'm contemplating, but I'd like to experiment. Unfortunately, I don't have time these days, so it may be quite a while before I get to try this.

I'm gonna describe the things I'd like to improve with my next big knife, as compared to my current one. (again, see pics above.) I'd like you all to start thinkin' about how the changes and pieces would all come together, and see if your design looks anything like the one I've come up with. Drawings and pictures would be great if you can do 'em.

One thing I'd probably do different, is use a different steel, if for no other reason than just to see how tough it is. I'm thinking CPM 3V, S5, or possibly L6.

I'm thinking about making the next one just a bit shorter- maybe 22 inches overall, but no less.

The flat main grind is just barely thick enough to prevent damage above the edge. I ground the rear half the the blade much thinner than the tip, (intentionally, but it was flawed reasoning) and it now has a ripple that extends about a half inch into the meat of the blade. So, I'm thinking about using a convex grind on the next one, so I have more support behind the edge.

However, if I go with a full convex grind, I'm afraid the blade will be far too heavy. I still want to keep it at least 2 inches wide, because I like the idea of "sectional density", and I don't want to have to use thin stock to compensate for it, because I prefer stiffness. In fact, I'd like the blade to be stiffer than my present knife, which was ground from 1/4" stock. (with plenty of tapers)

So, I'm thinking I'd use fullers to reduce the weight, while still allowing the blade to have a thick maximal cross section.

But how do you make some serious fullers, without totally changing the whole aesthetics of the traditional Sheffield bowie? Would it even still look like a bowie?

This knife must have great cutting power, but at the same time be quick in the hand. Though hard objects are not its primary targets, reality dictates that the blade must be able to withstand them. I.E., hard accidental hits on rocks and such.

The guard needs to be changed. I have no problem carrying around a two foot long knife all day. The two pounds or so stuck in my belt (crossdraw) don't bother me. BUT, the top arm of that guard sure does! That sucker digs right into my "love handle", and is the most uncomfortable part of carrying this huge knife. I do need a guard, to keep my hand in place during thrusts. But I have to do something different....

I like the way the tip curves upwards to the point. But, at the same time, the tip is a bit too high compared to the centerline of the handle. I'd like to have the point below centerline.

I use this knife for powerful chopping most of the time, (maybe around 85%-90% of the time) but still need a point fine enough for thrusting. My knife above is the widest I want to go with the point.

I still need a good sized pommel or butt, to keep it from squirting out of my hand during adrenalized swings. I made the above bowie's handle symmetrical, because I use it edge up, so I can use the sharpened false edge for certain tasks. But, I must admit I use it in the "normal" edge down fashion far more often, so I may be willing to compromise here.

The guard keeps my hand from sliding forward, the pommel keeps it from sliding back; now I need to keep it from flipping sideways out of my grasp. I.E., the momentum of the swinging knife is almost enough to open my fingers a bit, if I don't expect it. I need something else on the handle to keep it from sliding or twising sideways.

My current bowie has a gentle recurve to the main edge, and I'd like to try a more pronounced recurve, to see how much more cutting power I can really gain (if any).

I still need the sharpened false edge. I like the concave curve for certain applications, but I want to change the grinds so there's not such a dramatic difference in the distal tapers. That is, the spine of the knife is 1/4" thick in front of the guard, but suddenly decreases where the false edge starts. Then it takes another sudden decrease in thickness where the clip starts. On a couple occasions during heavy chopping, I've noticed the blade flexing right at these locations. It may be nothing, but in theory, it would be better if these forces were spread evenly over the full length of the blade. If it keeps getting stressed in these "hot spots", it could theoretically cause premature fatigue failure.

The scabbard- My current one is wood. It needs reinforcement at the throat, as my quick drawing has already split the mouth. The body of the scabbard needs to be rather sturdy, because I carry it tucked through my belt, with a frog stud to keep it from dropping all the way through. (speaking of which, the frog stud needs to be lots bigger.) So if the scabbard were too flimsy, it would bend under my belt, preventing resheathing. This is especially important when moving- the scabbard really takes some strain getting twisted under my belt.

So, taking all the above into consideration, what would the new knife look like? Does it still look like a bowie? Is it possible to do all this at once? I already have a quick sketch drawn up, but want to see your ideas first.

Again, drawings would be great, and have fun with this one! :D
 
I'll need to reread your post but my initial feeling is to not be concerned with the weight. Here's why. When you grind a piece of stock with a tall flat grind the knife will loose ALOT of weight. Think about a section of the knief say 1/2 way up on a 1.5" tall blade. Even if you use 3/16" stock the steel at the mid section will be around 1/16 to 1/8" thick or maybe a little thicker depending on the grind. I would focus on the handle shape the most.

I would say grind a pair. One will fullers, and one without.... see what they both feel like that way you wont be wondering when your finished :D
 
Thanks for the quick reply, Mr. Goode.
You may be right- I may not end up needing the fullers anyway. But I wouldn't grind two seperate blades. I already have a pretty good idea of the edge geometry and handling characteristics I want, so if it still felt too heavy, I'd grind in some fullers. If not, I'd leave 'em off. However, since I'd have to start with 1/4" stock, (was even thinking about starting with 3/8" stock, and going crazy with the grinder from there) I am a bit concerned with the weight. As I was finishing my big bowie, it was still just a little too slow. A few more passes with the grinder didn't remove very much metal, but really made a difference in the balance.
 
Ok, my opinion probably means squat here, because I love that bowie JUST THE WAY IT IS. The only improvement I would make is to use a tougher steel, like L6 or 3V. I've held that knife, and it's got a great balance for such a big, honkin bowie. Don't change the style one little bit, please.
 
I think that's a pretty good looking knife as is, but since you're asking for thoughts here's some of mine.

The flat main grind is just barely thick enough to prevent damage above the edge. I ground the rear half the the blade much thinner than the tip, (intentionally, but it was flawed reasoning) and it now has a ripple that extends about a half inch into the meat of the blade. So, I'm thinking about using a convex grind on the next one, so I have more support behind the edge.

However, if I go with a full convex grind, I'm afraid the blade will be far too heavy. I still want to keep it at least 2 inches wide, because I like the idea of "sectional density", and I don't want to have to use thin stock to compensate for it, because I prefer stiffness. In fact, I'd like the blade to be stiffer than my present knife, which was ground from 1/4" stock. (with plenty of tapers)

I still need the sharpened false edge. I like the concave curve for certain applications, but I want to change the grinds so there's not such a dramatic difference in the distal tapers. That is, the spine of the knife is 1/4" thick in front of the guard, but suddenly decreases where the false edge starts. Then it takes another sudden decrease in thickness where the clip starts. On a couple occasions during heavy chopping, I've noticed the blade flexing right at these locations. It may be nothing, but in theory, it would be better if these forces were spread evenly over the full length of the blade. If it keeps getting stressed in these "hot spots", it could theoretically cause premature fatigue failure.

Convex is the way to go in my opinion, it's my favorite grind.It doesn't need to be heavy just because it's convex, there's two ways I know of around this without fullering or anything like that. First you can make it a very flat convex, then it's barely heavier then a flat grind. The other way, and my suggestion to you, is to grind it not like an ax where the thickest part is the spine, but like a sword where the thickest part is about half to two thirds up from the edge and it tapers back down from there to the spine. By doing it that way the meat of the thickness won't be effected by a dramatic false edge for the flexing (though convex tends to be stiffer anyway), and in fact the tapering back down will aid it the making of the false edge. Also having the thickest part in line with the point lets you make the point be narrower yet still well supported by the thickness.

So, I'm thinking I'd use fullers to reduce the weight, while still allowing the blade to have a thick maximal cross section.

But how do you make some serious fullers, without totally changing the whole aesthetics of the traditional Sheffield bowie? Would it even still look like a bowie?

Honestly, I think this would make it look like a giant K-bar. With the tapered spine and distal taper it shouldn't be needed for reduced weight anyway.

The guard needs to be changed. I have no problem carrying around a two foot long knife all day. The two pounds or so stuck in my belt (crossdraw) don't bother me. BUT, the top arm of that guard sure does! That sucker digs right into my "love handle", and is the most uncomfortable part of carrying this huge knife. I do need a guard, to keep my hand in place during thrusts. But I have to do something different....

You could do a half guard, where it just comes down on the edge side of the handle, not on the spine side. Have it curl forward and it won't be in the way of the reversed grip either.

The scabbard- My current one is wood. It needs reinforcement at the throat, as my quick drawing has already split the mouth. The body of the scabbard needs to be rather sturdy, because I carry it tucked through my belt, with a frog stud to keep it from dropping all the way through. (speaking of which, the frog stud needs to be lots bigger.) So if the scabbard were too flimsy, it would bend under my belt, preventing resheathing. This is especially important when moving- the scabbard really takes some strain getting twisted under my belt.

I personally like wood scabbards. You could maybe line the mouth with a copper collar or something, to prevent the wood from being cut. Copper should be soft enough not to damage the blade on drawing, and still be pretty much cut-proof as long as you don't totally try to cut it. To make the whole thing sturdier, a thin wrapping of leather or even cloth adds a lot of toughness, though I've never found I needed it.

Can't wait to see pics of the project.
 
Dan-
Don't worry man. I think this concept will be removed far enough from the origional that I can consider them two seperate designs. I still plan on making Bowies almost identical to the one above. I plan to tweak the grind thickness, steel type, handle attachment methods, change the guard slightly for comfort, and maybe change the handle slightly. It's not that I'm unhappy with the design; it's been working extremely well for me. I just want to experiment with a couple ideas that have been floating around in my head for quite some time.

AwP-
I keep thinking your name is Andy. Is that correct?
Thanks for weighing in with some thoughts! I believe there's merit in a lot of what you said. In fact,

AwP said:
The other way, and my suggestion to you, is to grind it not like an ax where the thickest part is the spine, but like a sword where the thickest part is about half to two thirds up from the edge and it tapers back down from there to the spine. By doing it that way the meat of the thickness won't be effected by a dramatic false edge for the flexing (though convex tends to be stiffer anyway), and in fact the tapering back down will aid it the making of the false edge. Also having the thickest part in line with the point lets you make the point be narrower yet still well supported by the thickness.

-I've been thinking about approaching the grinds this way myself.

I'm thinking there may be a way to fix the guard without just chopping off the top arm. To be honest, I probably don't need that top arm as long as I've got something to keep my hand in place, but to me a single guard changes it from "bowie" to "camp knife". I know, it may be silly, but if I can achieve my aesthetic goals without compromising function, it would be a win/win situation.
 
You're right, my name is Andy. Hmm, maybe having a double guard that curves up on both sides might put it top side a little more out of the way, but it's hard to say without trying it. Maybe you could make some sort of wooden mockup to see if it's comfy to wear or not.
 
Well, I'm kinda surprised there weren't more makers around here wanting to discuss design, especially when the subject of Bowies comes up. Perhaps I overestimated my good standing with the members of this forum...

So here's what I came up with. After drawing a bunch of doodles, I realized it may be easier to seek inspiration from historical examples, and then modify them to suit my needs.

attachment.php


What do ya'll think? It doesn't look much like a classic bowie anymore, but could it be better? It combines the sharpened clip and thrusting tip of a bowie, but tapered without sudden changes in thickness, the belly of a kukri, tip below the handle for better alignment for my targets, stout convex grinds for strength and cutting ability, fullers allow it to be thick enough for stiffness, yet light enough for speed. The downcurved handle should generate more chopping power, but at the expense of versatility. (I admit I started looking at this historical handle shape just because it seemed to suit the blade style) It has a big pommel, the guard is shorter with more rounded arms for comfort, but still big enough to keep my hand in place. Those lines carved lengthwise in the handle are to keep it from spinning out of my grip.

As I mentioned earlier, this design is different enough that I still plan to refine my big bowie on its own. The big challenge in making it, will be finding stock big enough since I don't forge, and then doing all that grinding!
 
Possum, what steel choice where you going with? You could go with A2 or O1 and use 5/32 thickness if you want to go with a convex grind. Even though the stock is thinner you still have plenty of blade strength with the convex grind. If you still want to stay with 5160, 1/4" stock, do a flat grind but leave enough at the edge to slack belt grind a convex edge about a 1/4" or more up. I reprofiled my Ontario RTAK with a convex edge and the cutting ability is extremely better. It bites deep into wood more so then with the original flat grind edge. A guard really is a personal choice, I don't care for them at all. Since you hunt with your big knife, a guard should be in the cards. Especially if stabbing is involved. I've made downward thrusts with guardless knives as long as you have a cord wrapped securely around your wrist, slipping was not an issue for me.
Scott
 
Don't know for sure what kind of steel I'd use yet. Ideally, I want to try one of the more impact resistant steels, like CPM-3V or S5, or maybe L6, but it will probably depend on the size stock I can get and how much that will cost. I did a full size sketch yesterday, and it looks like I need stock almost 3 inches wide to accomodate the curves! :eek: Maybe I'll see if I can get it within 2 1/2" by lessening the curvature a bit. Either way, there's gonna be more steel laying on my shop floor than in the blade when I'm done.

I realize forging would be a much more efficient way to make a knife like this, but I don't have the equipment or experience to trust myself. I don't want to take a chance on screwing up the steel, and not know it until I've spent so much time finishing it.

Though the main body of the blade will be thinner, I don't want to start with stock thinner than 1/4", because I need room for tapers and such to distribute the mass for better balance. If I start out thin, I can only go thinner, and then I'm pretty sure I won't have enough mass for the chopping power I want.
 
Don't discount 5160, it might be more common then the others you mentioned, but is still an excellent blade steel for toughness.
 
It sounds like maybe flat to convex may be the way to go.
Scott
 
Back
Top