I hope you'll report back as to the comparison of grain size in the rest of the knife, Sean. While it will be good info, I am sad to know you have to sacrifice a very nice looking finished piece.
I have asked the question before regarding whether grain growth is a rate-based phenomenon or solely a temp phenomenon. I have been told everything from time has nothing to do with it, only temp, to an explanation that there is somewhat of a threshhold temp beyond AC3 where it will occur. The implication in that statement was that normal austenitizing temps wouldn't provoke grain growth. It was suggested that, at a given temp, grain growth will initiate and grow to a certain point and stop. I still don't have a good answer and my reading hasn't provided one.
It would be real nice if, once Kevin has some time, he might revisit this thread and make a couple comments. Perhaps Robert may have some insight, also. I would enjoy expanding my understanding.
I vastly prefer my furnaces to HT with a forge or torch, and the only thing I would like better is a set of salt pots. The drawback, of course, is that it is a lot of work for one blade, which I feel is what most likely led you to using the forge on this one. Two possibilities that occur to me are that 1) your probe has lost its accuracy (that's happened to me), or, 2) in the chaotic environment of a forge, where you measured the temp versus where the blade got hot may be two different temps. That's two possibilites; I'm sure you've considered more. Good luck with your troubleshooting. I'm sure you're as obsessive as me wanting to know an answer....
