Nepali vs Indian MK IIs

[JDP]

I have had more than a few questions about the differences between an Indian made and a Nepali made MK II. The differences are subtle, but worth noting for you collectors of antique military kukris.

First, you cannot go by any marks. Both were used by the British-Indian Gurkha regiments in WW II and both MAY have proper proof marks with the broad arrow. The chos vary also and aren't a true indicator.

Apparently scabbards for both were made in India and as typical of this model no karda or chakmak were attached so no difference there.

The difference in weight and length vary too much to be an accurate guide.

Look for a slight upturn at the end of the blade, a more robust and rounded profile at the lower part of the grip, less finished wood and slightly thicker steel. Hopefully this picture will help.

 

[Red]

"Look for a slight upturn at the end of the blade, a more robust and rounded profile at the lower part of the grip, less finished wood and slightly thicker steel. Hopefully this picture will help."

I take it this is for the Nepali Khukuris? I'm afraid I can't see a difference in the photo, I'll try at home with better conditions.

 

[Mr.BadExample]

Good way to put it in words, John- you can see the difference immediately, but it's hard to describe. The Nepali one has a much nicer profile.

 

[spiraltwista]

mmmmmmmmm A bit like blondes & brunettes realy, both lovely in their own way, but taste can sometimes lean one way or another.
Spiral