Hi all,
I received my new Cadet in the mail today and thought I'd share what I think about the knife.
First, I purchased a 301 Stockman about a month ago that had some problems, (spey blade tip ground off to one side, slight side-side blade play, sharp bolsters). So I thought I'd try another but after looking at the 301 and 303, it appeared to me that the Cadet was a better design specifically the shape of the spey blade and the fact it's tip is not exposed when closed. So what I noticed with the Cadet, is all blades ground correctly with no rubbing. Spring strength is about the same as my 301, on the weak side with very little snap. In fairness though, I have not lubed them yet so that may improve a bit. The main and sheepsfoot both have slight left/right play but not much but the bolsters are nicely radiused on both top and bottom unlike my 301 which is sharp on the bottom corners. Finally, two of the back springs do not sit flush and protrude up a bit on the ends.
Overall, I'm not too impressed with what I'm seeing on my two new Buck traditional folders. FWIW I also picked up a 389 Chinese made Canoe a couple of weeks ago and have no complaints (except the blade steel)...so I just don't get it. How buck can make knives like my 3, 110's and recently purchased 112 so well and then put out pocket folders with the things I'm seeing is disheartening for me. I've always liked the company and want to see them do well but this just isn't cutting it. I think next week I'm going to send them both back to see what they can do.
I received my new Cadet in the mail today and thought I'd share what I think about the knife.
First, I purchased a 301 Stockman about a month ago that had some problems, (spey blade tip ground off to one side, slight side-side blade play, sharp bolsters). So I thought I'd try another but after looking at the 301 and 303, it appeared to me that the Cadet was a better design specifically the shape of the spey blade and the fact it's tip is not exposed when closed. So what I noticed with the Cadet, is all blades ground correctly with no rubbing. Spring strength is about the same as my 301, on the weak side with very little snap. In fairness though, I have not lubed them yet so that may improve a bit. The main and sheepsfoot both have slight left/right play but not much but the bolsters are nicely radiused on both top and bottom unlike my 301 which is sharp on the bottom corners. Finally, two of the back springs do not sit flush and protrude up a bit on the ends.
Overall, I'm not too impressed with what I'm seeing on my two new Buck traditional folders. FWIW I also picked up a 389 Chinese made Canoe a couple of weeks ago and have no complaints (except the blade steel)...so I just don't get it. How buck can make knives like my 3, 110's and recently purchased 112 so well and then put out pocket folders with the things I'm seeing is disheartening for me. I've always liked the company and want to see them do well but this just isn't cutting it. I think next week I'm going to send them both back to see what they can do.
Last edited: