I see it. It's fairly obvious, albeit miniscule. But I wouldn't be that concerned. It's a production blade, not a custom, and easily within specs. If you really want a perfect blade with perfectly even grinds, buy one that costs two or 3 times as much, or go custom, IMO. Give Nathan the Machinist a try, or NickWheeler.
IMHO, if you're buying a Becker for fit and finish, you're doing it wrong. You buy Becker because they're affordable, tough, comfortable, and get the job done, and they're one of the easiest production blades to make your own. Also because, if anything serious happens to the blade, you get great CS from Ka-bar.
No offense to you, but I've seen far too many of these lately, and this sort of "complaint" will only ruin CS for everyone else. When you send in an inexpensive blade like this for minor cosmetic issues, if the company pays for shipping, you cost the company probably a third of the cost of the blade in shipping costs, and more to pay the customer service folks. And it's ultimately within specs. Too much of that, and they're going to crack down, and that can only hurt people with more realistic concerns, such as a legitimate factory defect.
That? That's not a defect. You can get a blade to look like that just by sharpening it yourself, or fix it if you are good at it. And it's a lot easier for you, because you only have ONE blade to deal with, than it is for someone who does hundreds a day or week or whatever.
Beckers are dirt cheap. I have a lot more appreciation for how inexpensive they are after I started making blades myself, and I often think that people who expect perfection out of a cheap knife like a Becker should try making one themselves just for that perspective. Most of my blades cost me almost as much (or sometimes more) to make as it would to just buy a Becker. And sometimes I do just buy the Becker, because they're great value. Because they're so cheap, they have to cut corners somewhere, or else you're just insisting on taking food out of someone's mouth (or their kids' mouths) because of something like this. That's the end result of this type of thinking for a blade at this price point, IMO. If you don't like it, you have the right to take your money elsewhere. But I'll be frank. I personally, think that complaining about this sort of thing is detrimental to everyone else who wants to buy knives at this price point. Do you complain about this when you buy Condor? Or a handmade piece from Himalayan Imports that probably costs twice as much? I don't see much of that going on in either of those places. Why Beckers seem to get the bulk of the people expecting $200 fit and finish out of a $60 knife, I don't know. But I don't like it.
This is nothing against Douglas Thor in particular. I just had to rant a little bit about the phenomenon. I hope Douglas Thor doesn't take this as a personal strike against him, since it's not intended as such, but rather more as a critique of the global issue. I understand the desire to get a perfect product from your money. I wasn't particularly happy about the level of fit and finish I got out of a $400 custom order once. But I do think that it might be worth thinking realistically about what's a fair expectation for quality in fit and finish from a sub-$100 knife. I figure, you get good quality, good fit and finish, or inexpensive. Pick 2 (or 1, in many cases).
.