- Joined
- Feb 21, 2007
- Messages
- 950
sm2 (Steve) and jackknife: This is all your fault. ElCuchillo's alligator story didn't help me any, either.
Peanuts have been discussed a lot here. I have resisted buying a Case Peanut for a long time. Just couldn't see the utility. Then last fall, I got a Victorinox Executive, started carrying it every day beside my wallet, and realized that a knife that length does actually have utility beyond light duty, unlike the penknives I like to pick up occassionally are basically suited to, if it is built right for it.
The constant "You'll be surprised, old guys know, the Peanut can do anything, yada yada" wore me down, and I started actually looking at them. Anyway, I bid on 4 or 5 of them until I finally won an Ebay auction at a price I could live with. Been sitting on the mailbox for days now, just like I always do when I get a new knife.
It arrived this afternoon.
First impression on opening the box at the mailbox: "You've got to be kidding me!" Not a negative, just... I was giggling. It's just so tiny. It's a giggle. And there are places that won't let you carry a knife this size, because it's somehow too big!! Can't imagine.
This is a very small knife. Yellow Delrin, CV steel. Comparisons are inevitable, so I'm going to throw a few of them in here. It is 1/8" shorter than my Vic Executive. Even so, the main blades are similar in length. The main blade on my Vic Pocket Pal, which has about half inch of handle length on both the Peanut and Executive, is only 1/8" longer. The blade steel stock of the main blade on the Executive is thicker -- even thicker than on the Pocket Pal. The handles on all three are very similar in thickness, but the Executive is much, much wider than the Peanut, by about X2, which gives the fingers a bit more to hold onto. The Pocket Pal, while not quite as wide, has more length for the same purpose.
The Case Peanut is very nicely put together. Smooth action, half-stops -- who puts half-stops on a sub-three inch bitty little knife? Yet, there they are. I have one jackknife this size -- a very old Imperial that I bought to replace the first knife I ever had. It's a serpentine handle, instead of a peanut style. I've never even bothered to sharpen it. It was a cheap knife when my dad bought me my first, it was cheap when they made it, and it was cheap when I bought the replacement for nostalgia. If my old one had had the half-stops that are on this Case, I probably wouldn't have a scar on the knuckle of my right index finger... Anyway.
The construction of the Peanut lives up to the bigger Case knives I have, and to their claim of producing premium pocket cutlery. Just because it is small, doesn't mean that it is weak, wimpy, or worthless. It is solid, just small. Weighs about twice as much as the Vic Pocket Pal, or any true penknife I have, and just about as much as the Vic Executive.
Just as I had previously thought, it feels miniscule in my hand. I wouldn't want to try to use anything smaller in a serious way. Even this, is pushing things. Looks like "scalpel hold" will be the order of things when I put it to use. In other words, it will force finesse by the size of its handle instead of allowing force or leverage to accomplish a task.
I don't mind small blades. What concerns me in my future use of this little knife is the length and width of the handle. I have a medium-sized Case jackknife, I think they call the Texas Jack, that has a broken pen blade. I reshaped the end of it, and its cutting edge is now about 1/2" long. It's very useful, but it has a handle behind it. Leverage is part of finesse, sometimes, and that stubby blade with the longer handle allows plenty of leverage. It's very usefull for ripping open boxes, or woodcarving. The little Peanut is going to be limited in the amount of leverage available, and I think that is probably a good thing considering the thin blade steel. Too much leverage might do bad things to that thin stuff.
Width, like on my Executive, can make up for a lack of length in some cases.
As I look at it, I think I will probably carry and use it. It is just too cute not to. But I am not going to carry it alone, I think. Though it is built much more stoutly than any of my nice little penknives, I'll be much more confident doing some things with a longer, more heavily built knife that I can use some leverage on.
My dad told me that he bought a couple of Tiny Trappers at a knife show over the weekend, because they were cute, but he can't hardly even open one of them. He gave them to my mother for her trapper collection. I can't see me ever getting a Tiny Trapper, except as a curio. 1/2" shorter? Wow. There may be such a thing as "too cute".
Don't nobody start pushing the Tiny Trappers, now. I do have some self control. I do.
Steve, Jackknife, this is all your fault.
Steve gets solo responsibility for my Barehead Trapper, though. And you were right, Steve. They seem to be getting along just fine.
Peanuts have been discussed a lot here. I have resisted buying a Case Peanut for a long time. Just couldn't see the utility. Then last fall, I got a Victorinox Executive, started carrying it every day beside my wallet, and realized that a knife that length does actually have utility beyond light duty, unlike the penknives I like to pick up occassionally are basically suited to, if it is built right for it.
The constant "You'll be surprised, old guys know, the Peanut can do anything, yada yada" wore me down, and I started actually looking at them. Anyway, I bid on 4 or 5 of them until I finally won an Ebay auction at a price I could live with. Been sitting on the mailbox for days now, just like I always do when I get a new knife.
It arrived this afternoon.
First impression on opening the box at the mailbox: "You've got to be kidding me!" Not a negative, just... I was giggling. It's just so tiny. It's a giggle. And there are places that won't let you carry a knife this size, because it's somehow too big!! Can't imagine.
This is a very small knife. Yellow Delrin, CV steel. Comparisons are inevitable, so I'm going to throw a few of them in here. It is 1/8" shorter than my Vic Executive. Even so, the main blades are similar in length. The main blade on my Vic Pocket Pal, which has about half inch of handle length on both the Peanut and Executive, is only 1/8" longer. The blade steel stock of the main blade on the Executive is thicker -- even thicker than on the Pocket Pal. The handles on all three are very similar in thickness, but the Executive is much, much wider than the Peanut, by about X2, which gives the fingers a bit more to hold onto. The Pocket Pal, while not quite as wide, has more length for the same purpose.
The Case Peanut is very nicely put together. Smooth action, half-stops -- who puts half-stops on a sub-three inch bitty little knife? Yet, there they are. I have one jackknife this size -- a very old Imperial that I bought to replace the first knife I ever had. It's a serpentine handle, instead of a peanut style. I've never even bothered to sharpen it. It was a cheap knife when my dad bought me my first, it was cheap when they made it, and it was cheap when I bought the replacement for nostalgia. If my old one had had the half-stops that are on this Case, I probably wouldn't have a scar on the knuckle of my right index finger... Anyway.
The construction of the Peanut lives up to the bigger Case knives I have, and to their claim of producing premium pocket cutlery. Just because it is small, doesn't mean that it is weak, wimpy, or worthless. It is solid, just small. Weighs about twice as much as the Vic Pocket Pal, or any true penknife I have, and just about as much as the Vic Executive.
Just as I had previously thought, it feels miniscule in my hand. I wouldn't want to try to use anything smaller in a serious way. Even this, is pushing things. Looks like "scalpel hold" will be the order of things when I put it to use. In other words, it will force finesse by the size of its handle instead of allowing force or leverage to accomplish a task.
I don't mind small blades. What concerns me in my future use of this little knife is the length and width of the handle. I have a medium-sized Case jackknife, I think they call the Texas Jack, that has a broken pen blade. I reshaped the end of it, and its cutting edge is now about 1/2" long. It's very useful, but it has a handle behind it. Leverage is part of finesse, sometimes, and that stubby blade with the longer handle allows plenty of leverage. It's very usefull for ripping open boxes, or woodcarving. The little Peanut is going to be limited in the amount of leverage available, and I think that is probably a good thing considering the thin blade steel. Too much leverage might do bad things to that thin stuff.
Width, like on my Executive, can make up for a lack of length in some cases.
As I look at it, I think I will probably carry and use it. It is just too cute not to. But I am not going to carry it alone, I think. Though it is built much more stoutly than any of my nice little penknives, I'll be much more confident doing some things with a longer, more heavily built knife that I can use some leverage on.
My dad told me that he bought a couple of Tiny Trappers at a knife show over the weekend, because they were cute, but he can't hardly even open one of them. He gave them to my mother for her trapper collection. I can't see me ever getting a Tiny Trapper, except as a curio. 1/2" shorter? Wow. There may be such a thing as "too cute".

Steve, Jackknife, this is all your fault.
Steve gets solo responsibility for my Barehead Trapper, though. And you were right, Steve. They seem to be getting along just fine.