Next Generation ...hammer pole?

Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
3
How about a NG with a hammer pole? I find hammer poles more appropriate for general use, than spikes. Further what are the weights of the various models and variants. Don't seem to be on the ATC product spec.s which are otherwise very complete.
 
Endgame:
I used to think your way as well. A hammer axe would be the way to go.

Unfortunatly the balance (in only MY aplications) and size of the head made the *hammer* usless. Well besides my sore hands.

I found using a malet sized rock worked better.

Also I have found the spike very useful in alot of situations (none military) I would only sugest that the spike more favor a climbing axe.

I hope this helped.
 
thanks for the response - JJW-
the utlity of a hammer on the back of a tomahawk has proved more useful to me thus far in jobs that a spike couldn't perform....

I have an RMJ Singman that I handled with 20" of air dried hickory...Weighs 1#13oz .. the head weighs 1#6oz...the handle is long enough to use with 2 hands for big tasks and small enough to wear as a belt ax when I cut next winter's firewood with my chainsaw....I limb all small limbs with Singman - easy to work both sides of the down tree at the same time from the same side...on the odd ocassions when the tree pinches the chainsaw bar I carry 2 plastic wedges in my back pocket and can drive i them with the hammer poll....in the winter woods in Alaska rocks aren't that easy to find....also used Singman to take apart my Sept. moose .... For utility use I think a hammer poll is more usefull than a spike...I also carry a 90cm long ice axe on my sno-go as part of my standard load....there is no substitue when you actually need one... .

the NG hawk looks quite well made and with a hammer poll might also suit my use...I may get a quote from ATC's custom shop... Again I wish they would list the head weight and total weight with their various models..
 
Back
Top