Hey all,
Long time lurker finally making a post. I've read about every thread I could on here in regards to the spyderco military and paramilitary 2. So I am not really looking for recommendations about which is better, I would just like some opinions on which to get first based on the knifes I have.
I only have two knifes worth mentioning which is a Kershaw Leek Composite Blackwash and a Kershaw Blur s30v. While I enjoy both I am looking for something different.
There are not any blade length restrictions here in MI. The knife will be an EDC. Used for opening boxes, cutting cardboard mail and other basic cutting. The last use would be self defense if my life would be threatened, but it is not its primary use.
I want it to be different from my BLUR, and while both the spydercos are different in terms of design and how they open, I am concerned that the paramilitary's blade is too similar to my BLUR. Since they are roughly the same length.
However, I do prefer the compression lock over the millies. Furthermore, I have medium sized hands and I am worried that the the grip on the military would be uncomfortable. Also, it seems the paramilitary is ridiculously popular by how fast they sell on the market and in stores. I can get both for about the same price so that is a wash.
My last question would be on going with the standard styles or getting a better steel such as m390 or s90v. I dont sharpen my knives often and most likely would have them professionally sharpened. Would I be better off stalking the forums hoping to find a nice sprint or just pulling the trigger on a brand new style? I would not be willing to go over $300 but would rather spend less. Do they still release sprints for these spydercos or am I stuck buying used?
I will be getting both eventually, but it will probably be a year apart at least. I really appreciate everyone's help as I have spent a great deal of time watching videos and reading through the forums. I feel it is time for some situational advice from you experienced experts. Thanks!
Long time lurker finally making a post. I've read about every thread I could on here in regards to the spyderco military and paramilitary 2. So I am not really looking for recommendations about which is better, I would just like some opinions on which to get first based on the knifes I have.
I only have two knifes worth mentioning which is a Kershaw Leek Composite Blackwash and a Kershaw Blur s30v. While I enjoy both I am looking for something different.
There are not any blade length restrictions here in MI. The knife will be an EDC. Used for opening boxes, cutting cardboard mail and other basic cutting. The last use would be self defense if my life would be threatened, but it is not its primary use.
I want it to be different from my BLUR, and while both the spydercos are different in terms of design and how they open, I am concerned that the paramilitary's blade is too similar to my BLUR. Since they are roughly the same length.
However, I do prefer the compression lock over the millies. Furthermore, I have medium sized hands and I am worried that the the grip on the military would be uncomfortable. Also, it seems the paramilitary is ridiculously popular by how fast they sell on the market and in stores. I can get both for about the same price so that is a wash.
My last question would be on going with the standard styles or getting a better steel such as m390 or s90v. I dont sharpen my knives often and most likely would have them professionally sharpened. Would I be better off stalking the forums hoping to find a nice sprint or just pulling the trigger on a brand new style? I would not be willing to go over $300 but would rather spend less. Do they still release sprints for these spydercos or am I stuck buying used?
I will be getting both eventually, but it will probably be a year apart at least. I really appreciate everyone's help as I have spent a great deal of time watching videos and reading through the forums. I feel it is time for some situational advice from you experienced experts. Thanks!